<div dir="ltr">My plan is to do that for all papers once past plenary to keep consistency with cxx_status.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 6:13 PM Aaron Ballman via Phabricator <<a href="mailto:reviews@reviews.llvm.org">reviews@reviews.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">aaron.ballman added reviewers: tahonermann, clang-language-wg.<br>
aaron.ballman added inline comments.<br>
<br>
<br>
================<br>
Comment at: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:271<br>
+- Added ``-Winvalid-utf8`` which diagnoses invalid UTF-8 code unit sequences in<br>
+  comments.<br>
<br>
----------------<br>
Should we mention `P2295R5` now that it's at least core approved? Something like:<br>
%%%<br>
...unit sequences in comments; in support of `P2295R5 <<a href="http://wg21.link/P2295R5" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://wg21.link/P2295R5</a>>`_.<br>
%%%<br>
<br>
<br>
Repository:<br>
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo<br>
<br>
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION<br>
  <a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D128059/new/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://reviews.llvm.org/D128059/new/</a><br>
<br>
<a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D128059" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://reviews.llvm.org/D128059</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>