<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<p>libclangcpp ?</p>
<p>I think it is a pretty common pattern.</p>
<p>On debian, apt-cache search 'lib.*cpp' returns a bunch of
libraries (libhdf5-cpp, libroscpp2d, libjsonrpccpp-dev,
libmysqlcppconn7v5,<br>
libsvncpp3, libtercpp0v5, libyaml-cpp-dev, etc)</p>
<p>S</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 02/07/2019 à 01:22, Chris Bieneman a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:9D8B7CD3-348F-4B34-93D4-32410345C37A@me.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
The question is, what *should* it be called.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">While yes, the 's' in 'so' is shared, the "dylib"
and "dll" extensions on Darwin and Windows have the same meaning
too. The problem is libclang.so is already taken.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I'm not attached to the name in any way, so I'm open
to suggestions.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">We do have documentation on best practices for how
to build distributions, which includes explanations of how to
pick and choose what you want to install (<a
href="http://llvm.org/docs/BuildingADistribution.html"
class="" moz-do-not-send="true">http://llvm.org/docs/BuildingADistribution.html</a>),
so you shouldn't need an option to disable it.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">-Chris</div>
<div class="">
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Jul 1, 2019, at 6:13 PM, Tom Stellard via
Phabricator <<a href="mailto:reviews@reviews.llvm.org"
class="" moz-do-not-send="true">reviews@reviews.llvm.org</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div class="">tstellar added a comment.<br class="">
<br class="">
In D61909#1563678 <<a
href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D61909#1563678"
class="" moz-do-not-send="true">https://reviews.llvm.org/D61909#1563678</a>>,
@sylvestre.ledru wrote:<br class="">
<br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">For now, it isn't part
of the debian packaging.<br class="">
<a
href="https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-llvm-team/llvm-toolchain/blob/snapshot/debian/rules#L563"
class="" moz-do-not-send="true">https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-llvm-team/llvm-toolchain/blob/snapshot/debian/rules#L563</a><br
class="">
it is removed as packaging phase as I have been told
it isn't ready.<br class="">
<br class="">
Anyway, the lib should not keep this name.<br class="">
By definition, on linux, .so means shared. It should
have a more explicit name.<br class="">
<br class="">
@beanz Can you please rename it? thanks<br class="">
</blockquote>
<br class="">
<br class="">
I've filed a bug for this and marked it as a blocker for
9.0.0, because once we ship a release with this name, it
will be harder to change: <a
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42475"
class="" moz-do-not-send="true">https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42475</a><br
class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
Repository:<br class="">
rC Clang<br class="">
<br class="">
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION<br class="">
<a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D61909/new/" class=""
moz-do-not-send="true">https://reviews.llvm.org/D61909/new/</a><br
class="">
<br class="">
<a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D61909" class=""
moz-do-not-send="true">https://reviews.llvm.org/D61909</a><br
class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>