<div><span style="font-size:13px">Would EXPECTED_FALSE(!Code) be better?</span></div><div><span style="font-size:13px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Jun 24, 2016, 17:42 Manuel Klimek <<a href="mailto:klimek@google.com">klimek@google.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">klimek added inline comments.<br>
<br>
================<br>
Comment at: unittests/Format/CleanupTest.cpp:258<br>
@@ +257,3 @@<br>
+    auto CleanReplaces = cleanupAroundReplacements(Code, Replaces, Style);<br>
+    EXPECT_TRUE((bool)CleanReplaces)<br>
+        << llvm::toString(CleanReplaces.takeError()) << "\n";<br>
----------------<br>
Hm. Can we make it work with EXPECT_TRUE somehow?<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://reviews.llvm.org/D21601" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://reviews.llvm.org/D21601</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>