<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_extra">Factors aside from what "people" (quoting Daniel Jasper) do, as a new committer, I presuppose that suggestions of experienced reviewers are in accordance with custom, and this was specifically requested, so I did it. (<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D10609&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=BSqEv9KvKMW_Ob8SyngJ70KdZISM_ASROnREeq0cCxk&m=pit26u58UW8id1HuPxL77g_rXWHLoVMwLY1Si1MZk2U&s=1rQguAGWpQLlDVh67A55v2gf9IonsStUwgWg0IF0fmY&e=">http://reviews.llvm.org/D10609</a>)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Clearly this is an area where guidelines for use of clang-format should be more clearly articulated if there is such fodder for discussion out of what I didn't anticipate being a controversial change.</div></div></div>