<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Ack, your response somehow got lost.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">LGTM.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">+More information could be found `here <<a href="http://clang.llvm.org/docs/Modules.html" class="">http://clang.llvm.org/docs/Modules.html</a>>`_</blockquote><br class=""></div><div class="">This should probably end with a period.</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Mar 10, 2015, at 1:10 AM, Vassil Vassilev <<a href="mailto:vvasilev@cern.ch" class="">vvasilev@cern.ch</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
  
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type" class="">
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class="">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">ping... I really want to close that
      annoying bugzilla ticket ;)<br class="">
      On 18/09/14 20:08, Vassil Vassilev wrote:<br class="">
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:541B1F90.20506@cern.ch" type="cite" class="">On
      18/09/14 18:04, Ben Langmuir wrote:
      <br class="">
      <blockquote type="cite" class="">
        <blockquote type="cite" class="">On Sep 18, 2014, at 3:47 AM, Vassil
          Vassilev <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:vasil.georgiev.vasilev@cern.ch"><vasil.georgiev.vasilev@cern.ch></a> wrote:
          <br class="">
          <br class="">
          On 09/17/2014 09:51 PM, Ben Langmuir wrote:
          <br class="">
          <blockquote type="cite" class="">
            <blockquote type="cite" class="">Index: docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
              <br class="">
===================================================================
              <br class="">
              --- docs/LanguageExtensions.rst    (revision 217389)
              <br class="">
              +++ docs/LanguageExtensions.rst    (working copy)
              <br class="">
              @@ -477,6 +477,13 @@
              <br class="">
                Use ``__has_feature(cxx_rtti)`` to determine if C++ RTTI
              has been enabled.  For
              <br class="">
                example, compiling code with ``-fno-rtti`` disables the
              use of RTTI.
              <br class="">
                +C++ Modules
              <br class="">
              +^^^^^^^^
              <br class="">
              +
              <br class="">
              +Use ``__has_feature(modules)`` to determine if
              experimental C++ Modules have
              <br class="">
              +been enabled. For example, compiling code with
              ``-fmodules`` enables the use of
              <br class="">
              +C++ Modules.
              <br class="">
              +
              <br class="">
                C++11
              <br class="">
                -----
              <br class="">
              <br class="">
            </blockquote>
            Why are we making this specific to C++ modules?  Modules are
            supported in C/ObjC. And to actually get modules in C++ you
            also need -fcxx-modules.
            <br class="">
          </blockquote>
          Thanks for the comments. lib/Driver/Tools.cpp:3790 says:
          <br class="">
            // -fmodules enables modules (off by default). However, for
          C++/Objective-C++,
          <br class="">
            // users must also pass -fcxx-modules. The latter flag will
          disappear once the
          <br class="">
            // modules implementation is solid for C++/Objective-C++
          programs as well.
          <br class="">
          <br class="">
          I prefer not to document the -fcxx-modules.
          <br class="">
        </blockquote>
        Yep, makes sense.
        <br class="">
        <br class="">
        <blockquote type="cite" class="">The attached patch doesn't mention the
          C++ modules but Modules in general (I decided to put them into
          a separate section). Is it any better?
          <br class="">
          Vassil
          <br class="">
        </blockquote>
        Much better - a couple more comments below:
        <br class="">
        <br class="">
        <blockquote type="cite" class="">+Modules
          <br class="">
          +-------
          <br class="">
          +
          <br class="">
          +C/ObjC Modules
          <br class="">
          +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
          <br class="">
        </blockquote>
        Do we really need a sub-heading?  If we do need one I suggest “C
        and Objective-C Modules”.  Otherwise just a heading “Modules”
        seems sufficient.
        <br class="">
      </blockquote>
      Yep good point.
      <br class="">
      <blockquote type="cite" class="">
        <br class="">
        <blockquote type="cite" class="">+
          <br class="">
          +Use ``__has_feature(modules)`` to determine if Modules have
          been enabled.
          <br class="">
          +For example, compiling code with ``-fmodules`` enables the
          use of Modules.
          <br class="">
        </blockquote>
        I suggest we put in a link to the modules documentation.
        <br class="">
      </blockquote>
      Now should be better. Thanks!
      <br class="">
      Vassil
      <br class="">
      <blockquote type="cite" class="">
        <br class="">
        <blockquote type="cite" class="">
          <blockquote type="cite" class="">Ben
            <br class="">
            <br class="">
            <blockquote type="cite" class="">On Sep 17, 2014, at 12:59 AM, Vassil
              Vassilev <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:vasil.georgiev.vasilev@cern.ch"><vasil.georgiev.vasilev@cern.ch></a> wrote:
              <br class="">
              <br class="">
              Hi,
              <br class="">
                I am attaching a patch addressing
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18985">http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18985</a>
              <br class="">
                I wasn't sure whether I had to say 'experimental C++
              modules'.
              <br class="">
              Vassil
              <br class="">
<Bug18985.diff>_______________________________________________
              <br class="">
              cfe-commits mailing list
              <br class="">
              <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a>
              <br class="">
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits</a>
              <br class="">
            </blockquote>
          </blockquote>
          <Bug18985_1.diff>
          <br class="">
        </blockquote>
      </blockquote>
      <br class="">
      <br class="">
      <br class="">
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br class="">
      <pre wrap="" class="">_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br class="">
    <br class="">
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
--------------------------------------------
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://five.sentenc.es/">http://five.sentenc.es</a>
</pre>
  </div>

</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>