<div dir="ltr">Would it be plausible to check this on templates directly, rather than on their instantiations? This would be less work in the case of multiple instantiations, avoid redundant diagnostics, fail on templates without instantiations rather than creating a lurking failure, and we might even get all the "dependent" tests for free - because we wouldn't be able to look through the dependent types at all.<br><br>- David</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:39 AM, jahanian <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fjahanian@apple.com" target="_blank">fjahanian@apple.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><br></div><div><div style="margin:0px;font-size:11px;font-family:Menlo">This patch restricts issuing -Winconsistent-missing-override when dealing with</div><div style="margin:0px;font-size:11px;font-family:Menlo">class template with dependent bases and dependent methods.</div><div style="margin:0px;font-size:11px;font-family:Menlo">Fixed pr22582 <a>rdar://19917107</a>.</div></div><div style="margin:0px;font-size:11px;font-family:Menlo">Please review.</div><div style="margin:0px;font-size:11px;font-family:Menlo"><br></div><div style="margin:0px;font-size:11px;font-family:Menlo">- Fariborz</div><div style="margin:0px;font-size:11px;font-family:Menlo"><br></div><div style="margin:0px;font-size:11px;font-family:Menlo"><span style="white-space:pre-wrap">     </span></div></div><br><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div style="margin:0px;font-size:11px;font-family:Menlo"></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-commits mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>