<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Oct 3, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Richard Smith <<a href="mailto:richard@metafoo.co.uk">richard@metafoo.co.uk</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><p dir="ltr">> But a bigger question is if there is objection to having this kind of potentially noisy warning? There will be projects which break and patch gets reverted.</p><p dir="ltr">I think it's fine if it's done right. I don't think the current approach is viable.</p><div><br></div></blockquote><div>I don’t quite understand “current approach". You mean this particular warning after ‘final’ you are objecting to? or reverting a patch because of new warnings.</div><div>- Fariborz</div><blockquote type="cite"><p dir="ltr">><br>
> - Fariborz<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</p>
</blockquote></div><br></body></html>