<div dir="ltr">I agree. In future I will provide the revision of the build as well as the date it was pulled and built. <div>Do you have an opinion on using the TOT at all? Perhaps it might be more significant to use a released version?<div>
<br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Eric</div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Tobias Grosser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tobias@grosser.es" target="_blank">tobias@grosser.es</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On 01/08/2014 03:59, Eric Fiselier wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Author: ericwf<br>
Date: Thu Jul 31 20:59:09 2014<br>
New Revision: 214474<br>
<br>
URL: <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=214474&view=rev" target="_blank">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-<u></u>project?rev=214474&view=rev</a><br>
Log:<br>
Update linux test results file<br>
<br>
Modified:<br>
libcxx/trunk/www/results.<u></u>Linux.html<br>
<br>
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/results.<u></u>Linux.html<br>
URL: <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/results.Linux.html?rev=214474&r1=214473&r2=214474&view=diff" target="_blank">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-<u></u>project/libcxx/trunk/www/<u></u>results.Linux.html?rev=214474&<u></u>r1=214473&r2=214474&view=diff</a><br>
==============================<u></u>==============================<u></u>==================<br>
--- libcxx/trunk/www/results.<u></u>Linux.html (original)<br>
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/results.<u></u>Linux.html Thu Jul 31 20:59:09 2014<br>
@@ -6,28 +6,17 @@<br>
<body><br>
<pre><br>
<br>
+This file was last updated 31/7/2014<br>
+<br>
All failures in the libc++ test suite will be documented here. Last<br>
-run was with Clang (pre-3.2) on Debian unstable x86_64 with eglibc<br>
-2.13 and kernel 3.2.0-3-amd64. The ABI library used was libc++abi.<br>
+run was with Clang Tip-of-Tree on Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 with eglibc<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Tip-of-Tree is not very precise. I wonder if it would make sense to give the exact revision number for people who want to reproduce the results?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Tobias<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>