<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=KOI8-R" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Added table in revision 212034.<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Best regards,
Alexey Bataev
=============
Software Engineer
Intel Compiler Team</pre>
27.06.2014 8:50, Samuel F Antao ΠΙΫΕΤ:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:OFE1C3D1BE.2C6BC05E-ON85257D04.00193FD5-85257D04.001A9146@us.ibm.com"
type="cite">
<p><font face="sans-serif" size="2">Hi Alexey,</font><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Alexey Bataev <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:a.bataev@hotmail.com"><a.bataev@hotmail.com></a>
wrote on 06/26/2014 11:29:04 PM:<br>
<br>
> From: Alexey Bataev <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:a.bataev@hotmail.com"><a.bataev@hotmail.com></a></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a>, Samuel F
Antao/Watson/IBM@IBMUS</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Date: 06/26/2014 11:29 PM</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Subject: Re: r211566 - [OPENMP] Added
initial checking of nesting of<br>
> OpenMP regions.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> Hi Samuel,<br>
> Thanks for the review.<br>
> > a) In in SemaOpenMP.cpp lines 936, 2292, 2404,
2797<br>
> > isOpenMPWorksharingDirective() dominates all the
other elements of the<br>
> > conditional i.e. the Boolean value returned by
this function will be the<br>
> > same as the remaining components of the
conditional. So, the other<br>
> > components can be removed.<br>
> ><br>
> This is done for future combined constructs like 'omp
parallel for' <br>
> which is parallel and worksharing at same time.</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Ok. Makes sense.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2"><br>
> > b) As other nesting constraints are added in
future commits, I expect the<br>
> > complexity/readability of CheckNestingOfRegions()
to increase. For now it<br>
> > is okay, but I think that maintaining some static
information about all the<br>
> > valid/invalid nestings will simplify the way this
function is implemented<br>
> > and improve readability.<br>
> What kind of static info do you mean?</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">I meant some sort of static table whose
elements contain the valid nestings, like:</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">[Parent Directive Kind, Current Directive
Kind, Closely|No-Closely|Both ]</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">If the nesting under test is not in the table
it would fail. As I have mentioned, the code looks okay</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">right now, but in the future if we see that
function starts to get messy due to the nestings
combinations</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">one can implement a solution like this. </font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2"><br>
> > c) For the sake of completeness I think
nestings_of_regions.cpp should also<br>
> > have a case where a nesting exists but it is not
closely nested. It may not<br>
> > make a lot of sense from an application point of
view, but I think it<br>
> > should be useful to have something like this in
the testcase:<br>
> ><br>
> > #pragma omp parallel<br>
> > #pragma omp for<br>
> > for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i){<br>
> > #pragma omp parallel<br>
> > for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i){<br>
> > #pragma omp for<br>
> > for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> > }<br>
> > }<br>
> ><br>
> Ok, I'll add such tests.</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Ok, thanks.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2"><br>
> > Question: Why the template version of foo in the
testcase?<br>
> Templates are very tricky constructs and actually we
have to test all <br>
> directives inside template constructs to be sure that
we handle <br>
> templates properly and instantiation and specialization
works for each <br>
> directive.</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Got it.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2"><br>
> <br>
> Best regards,<br>
> Alexey Bataev<br>
> =============<br>
> Software Engineer<br>
> Intel Compiler Team<br>
> <br>
> 27.06.2014 2:48, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits-request@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits-request@cs.uiuc.edu</a> ΠΙΫΕΤ:<br>
> > Send cfe-commits mailing list submissions to<br>
> > <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
> ><br>
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
Web, visit<br>
> > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits</a><br>
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body
'help' to<br>
> > <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits-request@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits-request@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
> ><br>
> > You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
> > <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits-owner@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits-owner@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
> ><br>
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
is more specific<br>
> > than "Re: Contents of cfe-commits digest..."<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Today's Topics:<br>
> ><br>
> > 1. Re: r211566 - [OPENMP] Added initial
checking of nesting of<br>
> > OpenMP regions. (Samuel F Antao)<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> >
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> ><br>
> > Message: 1<br>
> > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:48:56 -0400<br>
> > From: Samuel F Antao <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sfantao@us.ibm.com"><sfantao@us.ibm.com></a><br>
> > To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
> > Cc: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits-bounces@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits-bounces@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
> > Subject: Re: r211566 - [OPENMP] Added initial
checking of nesting of<br>
> > OpenMP regions.<br>
> > Message-ID:<br>
> >
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:OFFB19983E.4AA6C883-ON85257D03.007A5672-85257D03.007D5442@us.ibm.com"><OFFB19983E.4AA6C883-ON85257D03.007A5672-85257D03.007D5442@us.ibm.com></a><br>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Hi Alexey,<br>
> ><br>
> > I took a close look into this commit and I have
some suggestions to make:<br>
> ><br>
> > a) In in SemaOpenMP.cpp lines 936, 2292, 2404,
2797<br>
> > isOpenMPWorksharingDirective() dominates all the
other elements of the<br>
> > conditional i.e. the Boolean value returned by
this function will be the<br>
> > same as the remaining components of the
conditional. So, the other<br>
> > components can be removed.<br>
> ><br>
> > b) As other nesting constraints are added in
future commits, I expect the<br>
> > complexity/readability of CheckNestingOfRegions()
to increase. For now it<br>
> > is okay, but I think that maintaining some static
information about all the<br>
> > valid/invalid nestings will simplify the way this
function is implemented<br>
> > and improve readability.<br>
> ><br>
> > c) For the sake of completeness I think
nestings_of_regions.cpp should also<br>
> > have a case where a nesting exists but it is not
closely nested. It may not<br>
> > make a lot of sense from an application point of
view, but I think it<br>
> > should be useful to have something like this in
the testcase:<br>
> ><br>
> > #pragma omp parallel<br>
> > #pragma omp for<br>
> > for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i){<br>
> > #pragma omp parallel<br>
> > for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i){<br>
> > #pragma omp for<br>
> > for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> > }<br>
> > }<br>
> ><br>
> > Question: Why the template version of foo in the
testcase?<br>
> ><br>
> > Regards,<br>
> > --Samuel Antao<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> >> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:39:47 -0000<br>
> >> From: Alexey Bataev
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:a.bataev@hotmail.com"><a.bataev@hotmail.com></a><br>
> >> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
> >> Subject: r211566 - [OPENMP] Added initial
checking of nesting of<br>
> >> OpenMP regions.<br>
> >> Message-ID:
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:20140624043948.3A2702A6C029@llvm.org"><20140624043948.3A2702A6C029@llvm.org></a><br>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
> >><br>
> >> Author: abataev<br>
> >> Date: Mon Jun 23 23:39:47 2014<br>
> >> New Revision: 211566<br>
> >><br>
> >> URL: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=211566&view=rev">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=211566&view=rev</a><br>
> >> Log:<br>
> >> [OPENMP] Added initial checking of nesting of
OpenMP regions.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Added:<br>
> >>
cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/nesting_of_regions.cpp (with props)<br>
> >> Modified:<br>
> >>
cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td<br>
> >> cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp<br>
> >><br>
> >> Modified:
cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td<br>
> >> URL: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/</a><br>
> >>
Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td?rev=211566&r1=211565&r2=211566&view=diff<br>
> >><br>
> > <br>
>
==============================================================================<br>
> ><br>
> >> ---
cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
(original)<br>
> >> +++
cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td Mon Jun
23<br>
> >> 23:39:47 2014<br>
> >> @@ -7096,6 +7096,11 @@ def
err_omp_reduction_in_task : Error<<br>
> >> "reduction variables may not be accessed
in an explicit task">;<br>
> >> def err_omp_reduction_id_not_compatible :
Error<<br>
> >> "variable of type %0 is not valid for
specified reduction operation">;<br>
> >> +def err_omp_prohibited_region : Error<<br>
> >> + "region cannot be%select{| closely}0 nested
inside '%1' region"<br>
> >> + "%select{|; perhaps you forget to enclose
'omp %3' directive into<br>
> >> a parallel region?}2">;<br>
> >> +def err_omp_prohibited_region_simd :
Error<<br>
> >> + "OpenMP constructs may not be nested inside
a simd region">;<br>
> >> } // end of OpenMP category<br>
> >><br>
> >> let CategoryName = "Related Result Type
Issue" in {<br>
> >><br>
> >> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp<br>
> >> URL: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/</a><br>
> >>
SemaOpenMP.cpp?rev=211566&r1=211565&r2=211566&view=diff<br>
> >><br>
> > <br>
>
==============================================================================<br>
> ><br>
> >> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp
(original)<br>
> >> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp Mon Jun
23 23:39:47 2014<br>
> >> @@ -152,6 +152,12 @@ public:<br>
> >> OpenMPDirectiveKind getCurrentDirective()
const {<br>
> >> return Stack.back().Directive;<br>
> >> }<br>
> >> + /// \brief Returns parent directive.<br>
> >> + OpenMPDirectiveKind getParentDirective()
const {<br>
> >> + if (Stack.size() > 2)<br>
> >> + return Stack[Stack.size() -
2].Directive;<br>
> >> + return OMPD_unknown;<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >><br>
> >> /// \brief Set default data sharing
attribute to none.<br>
> >> void setDefaultDSANone() {
Stack.back().DefaultAttr = DSA_none; }<br>
> >> @@ -912,6 +918,41 @@ void
Sema::ActOnOpenMPRegionStart(OpenMP<br>
> >> }<br>
> >> }<br>
> >><br>
> >> +bool CheckNestingOfRegions(Sema &SemaRef,
DSAStackTy *Stack,<br>
> >> +
OpenMPDirectiveKind CurrentRegion,<br>
> >> + SourceLocation
StartLoc) {<br>
> >> + if (Stack->getCurScope()) {<br>
> >> + auto ParentRegion =
Stack->getParentDirective();<br>
> >> + bool NestingProhibited = false;<br>
> >> + bool CloseNesting = true;<br>
> >> + bool ShouldBeInParallelRegion = false;<br>
> >> + if (isOpenMPSimdDirective(ParentRegion))
{<br>
> >> + // OpenMP [2.16, Nesting of Regions]<br>
> >> + // OpenMP constructs may not be nested
inside a simd region.<br>
> >> + SemaRef.Diag(StartLoc,
diag::err_omp_prohibited_region_simd);<br>
> >> + return true;<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> + if
(isOpenMPWorksharingDirective(CurrentRegion) &&<br>
> >> +
!isOpenMPParallelDirective(CurrentRegion) &&<br>
> >> +
!isOpenMPSimdDirective(CurrentRegion)) {<br>
> >> + // OpenMP [2.16, Nesting of Regions]<br>
> >> + // A worksharing region may not be
closely nested inside a<br>
> > worksharing,<br>
> >> + // explicit task, critical, ordered,
atomic, or master region.<br>
> >> + // TODO<br>
> >> + NestingProhibited =
isOpenMPWorksharingDirective(ParentRegion) &&<br>
> >> +
!isOpenMPSimdDirective(ParentRegion);<br>
> >> + ShouldBeInParallelRegion = true;<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> + if (NestingProhibited) {<br>
> >> + SemaRef.Diag(StartLoc,
diag::err_omp_prohibited_region)<br>
> >> + << CloseNesting <<
getOpenMPDirectiveName(ParentRegion) <<<br>
> > true<br>
> >> + <<
getOpenMPDirectiveName(CurrentRegion) <<<br>
> >> ShouldBeInParallelRegion;<br>
> >> + return true;<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> + return false;<br>
> >> +}<br>
> >> +<br>
> >> StmtResult
Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective(OpenMPDirectiveKind<br>
> > Kind,<br>
> >>
ArrayRef<OMPClause<br>
> >> *> Clauses,<br>
> >>
Stmt *AStmt,<br>
> >> @@ -920,6 +961,8 @@ StmtResult
Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDi<br>
> >> assert(AStmt &&
isa<CapturedStmt>(AStmt) && "Captured
statement<br>
> > expected");<br>
> >> StmtResult Res = StmtError();<br>
> >> + if (CheckNestingOfRegions(*this, DSAStack,
Kind, StartLoc))<br>
> >> + return StmtError();<br>
> >><br>
> >> // Check default data sharing attributes
for referenced variables.<br>
> >> DSAAttrChecker DSAChecker(DSAStack, *this,
cast<CapturedStmt>(AStmt));<br>
> >> @@ -2246,7 +2289,8 @@ OMPClause
*Sema::ActOnOpenMPFirstprivate<br>
> >> // in a firstprivate clause on a
worksharing construct if any of<br>
> > the<br>
> >> // worksharing regions arising from
the worksharing<br>
> >> construct ever bind<br>
> >> // to any of the parallel regions
arising from the parallel<br>
> > construct.<br>
> >> - if
(isOpenMPWorksharingDirective(CurrDir)) {<br>
> >> + if
(isOpenMPWorksharingDirective(CurrDir) &&<br>
> >> +
!isOpenMPParallelDirective(CurrDir)) {<br>
> >> DVar =
DSAStack->getImplicitDSA(VD);<br>
> >> if (DVar.CKind != OMPC_shared) {<br>
> >> Diag(ELoc,
diag::err_omp_required_access)<br>
> >> @@ -2357,7 +2401,8 @@ OMPClause
*Sema::ActOnOpenMPLastprivateC<br>
> >> // lastprivate clause on a worksharing
construct if any of the<br>
> >> corresponding<br>
> >> // worksharing regions ever binds to any
of the corresponding<br>
> > parallel<br>
> >> // regions.<br>
> >> - if
(isOpenMPWorksharingDirective(CurrDir)) {<br>
> >> + if (isOpenMPWorksharingDirective(CurrDir)
&&<br>
> >> + !isOpenMPParallelDirective(CurrDir))
{<br>
> >> DVar =
DSAStack->getImplicitDSA(VD);<br>
> >> if (DVar.CKind != OMPC_shared) {<br>
> >> Diag(ELoc,
diag::err_omp_required_access)<br>
> >> @@ -2748,7 +2793,8 @@ OMPClause
*Sema::ActOnOpenMPReductionCla<br>
> >> // construct must be shared in the
parallel regions to which any of<br>
> > the<br>
> >> // worksharing regions arising from the
worksharing construct bind.<br>
> >> OpenMPDirectiveKind CurrDir =
DSAStack->getCurrentDirective();<br>
> >> - if
(isOpenMPWorksharingDirective(CurrDir)) {<br>
> >> + if (isOpenMPWorksharingDirective(CurrDir)
&&<br>
> >> + !isOpenMPParallelDirective(CurrDir))
{<br>
> >> DVar =
DSAStack->getImplicitDSA(VD);<br>
> >> if (DVar.CKind != OMPC_shared) {<br>
> >> Diag(ELoc,
diag::err_omp_required_access)<br>
> >><br>
> >> Added:
cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/nesting_of_regions.cpp<br>
> >> URL: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/</a><br>
> >>
nesting_of_regions.cpp?rev=211566&view=auto<br>
> >><br>
> > <br>
>
==============================================================================<br>
> ><br>
> >> ---
cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/nesting_of_regions.cpp (added)<br>
> >> +++
cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/nesting_of_regions.cpp Mon Jun 23
23:39:47 2014<br>
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@<br>
> >> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only
-fopenmp=libiomp5 -verify %s<br>
> >> +<br>
> >> +template <class T><br>
> >> +void foo() {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp parallel<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> +#pragma omp parallel<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for // expected-error {{OpenMP
constructs may not be<br>
> >> nested inside a simd region}}<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd // expected-error {{OpenMP
constructs may not be<br>
> >> nested inside a simd region}}<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp parallel // expected-error
{{OpenMP constructs may not<br>
> >> be nested inside a simd region}}<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for // expected-error {{region
cannot be closely nested<br>
> >> inside 'for' region; perhaps you forget to
enclose 'omp for'<br>
> >> directive into a parallel region?}}<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp parallel<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +}<br>
> >> +<br>
> >> +void foo() {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp parallel<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> +#pragma omp parallel<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for // expected-error {{OpenMP
constructs may not be<br>
> >> nested inside a simd region}}<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd // expected-error {{OpenMP
constructs may not be<br>
> >> nested inside a simd region}}<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp parallel // expected-error
{{OpenMP constructs may not<br>
> >> be nested inside a simd region}}<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for // expected-error {{region
cannot be closely nested<br>
> >> inside 'for' region; perhaps you forget to
enclose 'omp for'<br>
> >> directive into a parallel region?}}<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp simd<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> +#pragma omp for<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {<br>
> >> +#pragma omp parallel<br>
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i);<br>
> >> + }<br>
> >> + return foo<int>();<br>
> >> +}<br>
> >> +<br>
> >><br>
> >> Propchange:
cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/nesting_of_regions.cpp<br>
> >><br>
> > <br>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> ><br>
> >> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="svn:eol-style">svn:eol-style</a> = native<br>
> >><br>
> >> Propchange:
cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/nesting_of_regions.cpp<br>
> >><br>
> > <br>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> ><br>
> >> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="svn:keywords">svn:keywords</a> = Author Date Id Rev URL<br>
> >><br>
> >> Propchange:
cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/nesting_of_regions.cpp<br>
> >><br>
> > <br>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> ><br>
> >> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="svn:mime-type">svn:mime-type</a> = text/plain<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> ------------------------------<br>
> >><br>
> > -------------- next part --------------<br>
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
> > URL: <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/</a><br>
> 20140626/0739f9d2/attachment.html><br>
> ><br>
> > ------------------------------<br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > cfe-commits mailing list<br>
> > <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
> > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits</a><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > End of cfe-commits Digest, Vol 84, Issue 504<br>
> > ********************************************<br>
> <br>
</font></tt>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>