<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Daniel Jasper <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:djasper@google.com" target="_blank">djasper@google.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<div>I think we actually might need to merge the tokens.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>I was thinking about this. What if we just "hide" the "=", so that clang-format thinks there's just == or !=? I don't think we need to have any logic specific to javascript identity operators.</div>
</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Yes. We'll also need to increase the length of the token, but other than that this is what I mean by "merging".</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>
<br></div><div>Please take a look at the alternative implementation here: <a href="http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2240">http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2240</a></div><div><br></div></div>
</div></div>