<div dir="ltr">Done! r189174 and r189175.<br><div><br></div><div>cheers,</div><div>--renato</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 24 August 2013 13:32, Jeroen Hofstee <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clang@myspectrum.nl" target="_blank">clang@myspectrum.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div>Hello Renato,<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 08/18/2013 03:15 PM, Renato Golin wrote:<br>
</div></div></div><div><div class="h5">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">On 18 August 2013 08:17, Jeroen Hofstee <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clang@myspectrum.nl" target="_blank">clang@myspectrum.nl</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">If I
make -munaligned-access a dummy (at least that what<br>
I guess you mean), there is no proper way to allow
unaligned<br>
accesses on say one of the BSDs or e.g. armv6 and linux.<br>
Both flags are needed to control alignment behaviour in
general.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Good point. LGTM.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br></div></div>
I have not received any objections during the week. Can you<br>
consider applying these two?<br>
<br>
[PATCH] Add the -ffixed-r9 flag for ARM.<br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130812/086215.html" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130812/086215.html</a><br>
<br>
[PATCH] Add gcc ARM flags -munaligned-access / -mno-unaligned-access<br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130812/086216.html" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130812/086216.html</a><br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Jeroen<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>