<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">On Jul 31, 2013, at 5:59 AM, Rafael Espíndola <<a href="mailto:rafael.espindola@gmail.com">rafael.espindola@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><blockquote type="cite">And then the driver basically makes the same decision that it does today,<br>and if that differs from what it knows the frontend will decide, it should<br>pass the appropriate option.<br></blockquote><br>The -cc1 interface is not normally used by humans (other than us when<br>writing tests), so why is this mild duplication better? It seems that<br>if the driver needs to reason about some options, it should just pass<br>the result to -cc1. If the options don't change the driver behavior,<br>it should probably just forward them.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div>Well, it reduces the complexity of the frontend a bit. I wouldn’t fervently</div><div>oppose your proposal, though, as long as we preserve the basic idea</div><div>that the -cc1 default should be fully compliance with the selected language.</div><div><br></div><div>John.</div></body></html>