<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Jun 20, 2013, at 12:37 AM, Chandler Carruth <<a href="mailto:chandlerc@google.com">chandlerc@google.com</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Richard Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" target="_blank" class="cremed">richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":9a4" style="overflow:hidden">cfe/trunk/test/Modules/<span class="il">cxx</span>-<span class="il">many</span>-<span class="il">overloads</span>.<span class="il">cpp</span></div>
</blockquote></div><br>Hate to dig up this test, but I wanted to mention that this is the single slowest test in the regression test suite for me at 28.84s... Wondered if you had any ideas about making it cheaper.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div>Maybe it would just more appropriate in a different test suite? I believe there are a number of bots that run clang-tests, and getting 100% platform coverage doesn't seem completely imperative here.<div><br></div><div>John.</div></body></html>