<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Rafael Espíndola <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rafael.espindola@gmail.com" target="_blank">rafael.espindola@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 17 April 2013 12:17, Nico Weber <<a href="mailto:thakis@chromium.org">thakis@chromium.org</a>> wrote:<br>

> Hi,<br>
><br>
> gcc recently added colored diagnostics [1]. Their flag to control it is<br>
> slightly different from clangs, thereby making it obvious that they<br>
> independently discovered this concept and weren't influenced by clang at<br>
> all.<br>
<br>
</div>hehe<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> The attached patch lets clang understand gcc's spelling of the flag as well.<br>
><br>
> Ok?<br>
<br>
</div>Maybe also test what happens when clang's traditional and gcc's<br>
options are mixed?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Good idea, done.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
LGTM.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>r179728, thanks!<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">

<br>
> Nico<br>
><br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Rafael<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>