[PATCH] D64415: Consistent types and naming for AArch64 target features (NFC)

[Peter Smith via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

peter.smith added a comment.

FWIW I think this looks reasonable. The ARM equivalent uses bitfields such as

  unsigned CRC : 1;
  unsigned Crypto : 1;
  unsigned DSP : 1;
  unsigned Unaligned : 1;
  unsigned DotProd : 1;

Which would make more sense than using unsigned for each individual field. Several other targets that I looked at used bool and the Has<feature> convention so I think this brings AArch64 more in line with non ARM Targets at the cost of losing a little coherence with ARM where the name Crypto remains. I don't think that this is particularly important as the two have already started to diverge with HasDotProd.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D64415/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D64415