[PATCH] D56966: [clang-tidy] misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes: ignore implicit methods

Miklos Vajna via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jan 20 05:47:04 PST 2019


vmiklos updated this revision to Diff 182702.
vmiklos marked 3 inline comments as done.

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D56966/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D56966

Files:
  clang-tidy/misc/NonPrivateMemberVariablesInClassesCheck.cpp
  docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes.rst
  test/clang-tidy/misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes.cpp


Index: test/clang-tidy/misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/clang-tidy/misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes.cpp
+++ test/clang-tidy/misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes.cpp
@@ -35,6 +35,18 @@
   int S1_v3;
 };
 
+// Only data and implicit methods, do not warn
+
+class C {
+public:
+  C() {}
+  ~C() {}
+};
+
+struct S1Implicit {
+  C S1Implicit_v0;
+};
+
 //----------------------------------------------------------------------------//
 
 // All functions are static, do not warn.
Index: docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes.rst
===================================================================
--- docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes.rst
+++ docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-non-private-member-variables-in-classes.rst
@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@
 `cppcoreguidelines-non-private-member-variables-in-classes` redirects here
 as an alias for this check.
 
-Finds classes that contain non-static data members in addition to non-static
-member functions and diagnose all data members declared with a non-``public``
-access specifier. The data members should be declared as ``private`` and
-accessed through member functions instead of exposed to derived classes or
-class consumers.
+Finds classes that contain non-static data members in addition to user-provided
+non-static member functions and diagnose all data members declared with a
+non-``public`` access specifier. The data members should be declared as
+``private`` and accessed through member functions instead of exposed to derived
+classes or class consumers.
 
 Options
 -------
Index: clang-tidy/misc/NonPrivateMemberVariablesInClassesCheck.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tidy/misc/NonPrivateMemberVariablesInClassesCheck.cpp
+++ clang-tidy/misc/NonPrivateMemberVariablesInClassesCheck.cpp
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 }
 
 AST_MATCHER(CXXRecordDecl, hasNonStaticMethod) {
-  return hasMethod(unless(isStaticStorageClass()))
+  return hasMethod(unless(anyOf(isStaticStorageClass(), isImplicit())))
       .matches(Node, Finder, Builder);
 }
 
@@ -66,8 +66,9 @@
       IgnorePublicMemberVariables ? isProtected() : unless(isPrivate()));
 
   // We only want the records that not only contain the mutable data (non-static
-  // member variables), but also have some logic (non-static member functions).
-  // We may optionally ignore records where all the member variables are public.
+  // member variables), but also have some logic (non-static, non-implicit
+  // member functions).  We may optionally ignore records where all the member
+  // variables are public.
   Finder->addMatcher(cxxRecordDecl(anyOf(isStruct(), isClass()), hasMethods(),
                                    hasNonStaticMethod(),
                                    unless(ShouldIgnoreRecord),


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D56966.182702.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2928 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20190120/d5cdfc47/attachment.bin>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list