[PATCH] D55793: [clang-tidy] Add duplicated access specifier readability check (PR25403)

[Bruno Ricci via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

riccibruno added a comment.

In D55793#1333691 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55793#1333691>, @m4tx wrote:

> Don't use `CXXRecordDecl::accessSpecs()`, use unique comments in tests.


Thanks! `CXXRecordDecl` is already huge and so adding iterators for a single checker is in my opinion not a good idea (especially if the alternative is actually less code).
Would it make sense to also issue a diagnostic where the first access specifier is redundant (ie `public` in a `struct`, and `private` in a `class`) ?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D55793/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D55793