[PATCH] D54604: Automatic variable initialization

Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 17 11:20:13 PST 2018

rsmith added a comment.

Thanks, you've addressed my comments to my satisfaction. (Not approving as I've not done a detailed review of the implementation, only of the approach, but it looks like your review with @pcc is nearly complete.)

In D54604#1330356 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54604#1330356>, @jfb wrote:

> In D54604#1327893 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54604#1327893>, @rsmith wrote:
> > For the record: I'm OK with this direction. (I somewhat prefer removing the `-enable-long-wordy-thing` option and instead automatically disabling the `zero` option for clang release builds, but I'm OK with either approach.)
> I'm inclined to go with what @kcc wants, because I want the data he'll gather. For my own use, I don't really care. One thing I could do: check `__DATE__` and generate a warning if it's above a certain value and `zero` is used? i.e. check the date at which the compiler was compiled (not when it's used!) and error out if it was compiled after a certain point in time? I'm throwing out options that could makes folks more comfortable with `zero`...

If you want to go there, I'd be OK with that. I don't personally think it's necessary.

  rC Clang



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list