[PATCH] D52660: [CMake][Fuchsia] Use libc++ ABIv2 for Fuchsia toolchain

[Jake Ehrlich via cfe-commits]

We have no such desire. I think we're fine being the test subjects for
ABIv2 however.

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018, 4:51 PM Louis Dionne via Phabricator <
reviews at reviews.llvm.org> wrote:

> ldionne added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52660#1249709, @kristina wrote:
>
> > LGTM. Can we formalize ABIv2 as stable and make it distinct from
> unstable (soon to be ABIv3) or are there are any rough corners still left
> before ABIv2 and unstable can split in a feature freeze? I'm not an expert
> on libc++ related matters but @ldionne suggested that ABIv2 still wasn't
> ready on IRC (unless I misunderstood him).
>
>
> I don't think we've ever had plans to freeze the ABI v2 into something
> stable -- this is the first time I hear about it. I'm not saying it does
> not make sense, by the way, just that I haven't heard any plans about this.
> Does Fuchsia have a desire to stabilize the ABI of libc++?
>
>
> Repository:
>   rC Clang
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D52660
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20180928/24d19f0e/attachment.html>