[PATCH] D52193: RFC: [clang] Multithreaded compilation support

[Zachary Turner via cfe-commits]

In an ideal world yes, but the reality is that many people still use
MSBuild, and in that world /MP presumably helps quite a bit. And given that
many people already depend on this functionality of cl, it’s a potential
showstopper for migrating if we don’t support it. That said, if the benefit
isn’t significant that’s a stronger argument for not supporting it imo
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:45 AM Hans Wennborg via Phabricator <
reviews at reviews.llvm.org> wrote:

> hans added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52193#1237468, @zturner wrote:
>
> > What about the timings of clang-cl without /MP?
>
>
> And one using Ninja rather than msbuild.
>
> I think the real question is whether we want clang and clang-cl to do
> this. I'm not sure we do as it adds complexity for solving a problem that's
> better solved at the build system level.
>
>
> Repository:
>   rC Clang
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D52193
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20180918/e4808c17/attachment-0001.html>