[PATCH] D51806: [clang-cl] Enable -march

Alexandre Ganea via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 10 10:54:05 PDT 2018


Yes, indeed. The code in clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/X86.cpp makes that –march is always parsed, leaving out /arch unused, no matter in which order they appear.

De : Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org>
Envoyé : 10 septembre 2018 12:14
À : reviews+D51806+public+c25b17a1aa94d0fa at reviews.llvm.org; Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Phabricator <reviews at reviews.llvm.org>
Cc : Alexandre Ganea <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com>; cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org>
Objet : Re: [PATCH] D51806: [clang-cl] Enable -march

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:33 AM Hans Wennborg via Phabricator via cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
hans added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51806#1228893, @aganea wrote:

> @hans Just an after thought: maybe we should prevent usage of `-march=` and `/arch:` at the same time. What do you think? I can add another patch for that purpose.


Hmm, yes, at least we should warn or do something smart. Currently it doesn't look like they'd interact well together in x86::getX86TargetCPU

Wouldn't you get an "unused arg" for /arch if you use -march and /arch at the same time?



Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D51806



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20180910/e91c26dd/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list