[PATCH] D48852: [Sema] -Wformat-pedantic only for NSInteger/NSUInteger %tu/%td on Darwin

[JF Bastien via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

jfb accepted this revision.
jfb added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM after a few questions.



================
Comment at: include/clang/Analysis/Analyses/FormatString.h:265
+  enum class TypeKind { Unspecified, SizeT, PtrdiffT };
+  TypeKind TK = TypeKind::Unspecified;
 
----------------
"unspecified" seems odd because it *is* specified, we just don't care. How about something like "NothingSpecial" or "DontCare"?


================
Comment at: test/SemaObjC/format-size-spec-nsinteger.m:4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple thumbv7k-apple-watchos2.0.0 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple thumbv7k-apple-watchos2.0.0 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -verify -Wformat-pedantic -DPEDANTIC %s
 
----------------
We use a bunch of different triples to test WatchOS:

   5 thumbv7k-apple-watchos2.0
   3 i386-apple-watchos4
   2 x86_64-apple-watchos
   2 thumbv7k-apple-watchos
   2 armv7k-apple-watchos3.0.0
   2 armv7k-apple-watchos2.0
   2 armv7k-apple-watchos
   1 x86_64-apple-watchos-simulator
   1 thumbv7k-apple-watchos1.0
   1 i686-apple-watchos
   1 i386-apple-watchos3.0-simulator
   1 i386-apple-watchos3
   1 i386-apple-watchos2.1
   1 i386-apple-watchos2.0-simulator
   1 i386-apple-watchos2.0
   1 i386-apple-watchos-simulator
   1 i386-apple-watchos
   1 armv7k-apple-watchos2.1
   1 armv7-apple-watchos
   1 arm64-apple-watchos
   1 aarch64-apple-watchos

Do we care about v7k only for this test?


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D48852