[PATCH] D39050: Add index-while-building support to Clang

[Nathan Hawes via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

nathawes added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39050#1037008, @malaperle wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39050#1036394, @nathawes wrote:
>
> > @malaperle Just to clarify, what's the particular end-loc we're talking about here? e.g. for a function call, would this be the end of the function's name, or the closing paren? 
> >  For the end of the name, couldn't this be derived from the start loc + symbol name length (barring token pastes and escaped new lines in the middle of identifiers, which hopefully aren't too common)?
> >  I can see the value for the closing paren though.
>
>
> I mean the end of the name referencing the symbol, so that it can be highlighted properly when using the "find references in workspace" feature. There are cases where the name of the symbol itself is not present, for example "MyClass o1, o2;" (o1 and o2 reference the constructor), references to overloaded operators, etc.


Ah, I see – thanks! I was thinking all occurrences whose symbol name didn't actually appear at their location were marked with `SymbolRole::Implicit`, but that only seems to be true for the ObjC index data.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D39050