[libcxx] r323720 - First cut at issue statuses for JAX

Mon Jan 29 16:48:39 PST 2018

Author: marshall
Date: Mon Jan 29 16:48:39 2018
New Revision: 323720

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=323720&view=rev
Log:
First cut at issue statuses for JAX

Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html

Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=323720&r1=323719&r2=323720&view=diff
==============================================================================

--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Mon Jan 29 16:48:39 2018
@@ -59,64 +59,76 @@
   <table id="issues" border="1">
 	<tr><th>Issue #</th><th>Issue Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th></tr>
 
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2779">2779</a></td><td>[networking.ts] Relax requirements on buffer sequence iterators</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2870">2870</a></td><td>Default value of parameter theta of polar should be dependent</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2935">2935</a></td><td>What should create_directories do when p already exists but is not a directory?</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2941">2941</a></td><td>[thread.req.timing] wording should apply to both member and namespace-level functions</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2944">2944</a></td><td>LWG 2905 accidentally removed requirement that construction of the deleter doesn't throw an exception</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2945">2945</a></td><td>Order of template parameters in optional comparisons</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2948">2948</a></td><td>unique_ptr does not define operator<< for stream output</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2950">2950</a></td><td>std::byte operations are misspecified</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2952">2952</a></td><td>iterator_traits should work for pointers to cv T</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2953">2953</a></td><td>LWG 2853 should apply to deque::erase too</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2964">2964</a></td><td>Apparently redundant requirement for dynamic_pointer_cast</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2965">2965</a></td><td>Non-existing path::native_string() in filesystem_error::what() specification</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2972">2972</a></td><td>What is is_trivially_destructible_v<int>?</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2976">2976</a></td><td>Dangling uses_allocator specialization for packaged_task</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2977">2977</a></td><td>unordered_meow::merge() has incorrect Throws: clause</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2978">2978</a></td><td>Hash support for pmr::string and friends</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2979">2979</a></td><td>aligned_union should require complete object types</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2980">2980</a></td><td>Cannot compare_exchange empty pointers</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2981">2981</a></td><td>Remove redundant deduction guides from standard library</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2982">2982</a></td><td>Making size_type consistent in associative container deduction guides</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2988">2988</a></td><td>Clause 32 cleanup missed one typename</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2993">2993</a></td><td>reference_wrapper<T> conversion from T&&</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2998">2998</a></td><td>Requirements on function objects passed to {forward_,}list-specific algorithms</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3001">3001</a></td><td>weak_ptr::element_type needs remove_extent_t</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3024">3024</a></td><td>variant's copies must be deleted instead of disabled via SFINAE</td><td>Albuquerque</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2164">2164</a></td><td>What are the semantics of <tt>vector.emplace(vector.begin(), vector.back())</tt>?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2243">2243</a></td><td><tt>istream::putback</tt> problem</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2816">2816</a></td><td><tt>resize_file</tt> has impossible postcondition</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2843">2843</a></td><td>Unclear behavior of <tt>std::pmr::memory_resource::do_allocate()</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2849">2849</a></td><td>Why does <tt>!is_regular_file(from)</tt> cause <tt>copy_file</tt> to report a "file already exists" error?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2851">2851</a></td><td><tt>std::filesystem</tt> enum classes are now underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2969">2969</a></td><td><tt>polymorphic_allocator::construct()</tt> shouldn't pass <tt>resource()</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2975">2975</a></td><td>Missing case for <tt>pair</tt> construction in scoped and polymorphic allocators</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2989">2989</a></td><td><tt>path</tt>'s stream insertion operator lets you insert everything under the sun</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3000">3000</a></td><td><tt>monotonic_memory_resource::do_is_equal</tt> uses <tt>dynamic_cast</tt> unnecessarily</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3002">3002</a></td><td>[networking.ts] <tt>basic_socket_acceptor::is_open()</tt> isn't <tt>noexcept</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3004">3004</a></td><td>§[string.capacity] and §[vector.capacity] should specify time complexity for <tt>capacity()</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3005">3005</a></td><td>Destruction order of arrays by <tt>make_shared/allocate_shared</tt> only recommended?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3007">3007</a></td><td><tt>allocate_shared</tt> should rebind allocator to <i>cv</i>-unqualified <tt>value_type</tt> for construction</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3009">3009</a></td><td>Including <tt><string_view></tt> doesn't provide <tt>std::size/empty/data</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3010">3010</a></td><td>[networking.ts] <tt>uses_executor</tt> says "if a type <tt>T::executor_type</tt> exists"</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3013">3013</a></td><td><tt>(recursive_)directory_iterator</tt> construction and traversal should not be <tt>noexcept</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3014">3014</a></td><td>More <tt>noexcept</tt> issues with filesystem operations</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3015">3015</a></td><td><tt>copy_options::<i>unspecified</i></tt> underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3017">3017</a></td><td><tt>list splice</tt> functions should use <tt>addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3020">3020</a></td><td>[networking.ts] Remove spurious nested <tt>value_type</tt> buffer sequence requirement</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3026">3026</a></td><td><tt>filesystem::weakly_canonical</tt> still defined in terms of <tt>canonical(p, base)</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3030">3030</a></td><td>Who shall meet the requirements of <tt>try_lock</tt>?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3034">3034</a></td><td>P0767R1 breaks previously-standard-layout types</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3035">3035</a></td><td><tt>std::allocator</tt>'s constructors should be <tt>constexpr</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3039">3039</a></td><td>Unnecessary <tt>decay</tt> in <tt>thread</tt> and <tt>packaged_task</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3041">3041</a></td><td>Unnecessary <tt>decay</tt> in <tt>reference_wrapper</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3042">3042</a></td><td><tt>is_literal_type_v</tt> should be inline</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3043">3043</a></td><td>Bogus postcondition for <tt>filesystem_error</tt> constructor</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3045">3045</a></td><td><tt>atomic<<i>floating-point</i>></tt> doesn't have <tt>value_type</tt> or <tt>difference_type</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3048">3048</a></td><td><tt>transform_reduce(exec, first1, last1, first2, init)</tt> discards execution policy</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 
   </table>
 
 <h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
 <ul>
-<li>2779 - </li>
-<li>2870 - We already default to <tt>T(0)</tt>; but the PR says <tt>T()</tt>. Later - this makes no difference at all; since T has to be float/double/long double</li>
-<li>2935 - Eric? </li>
-<li>2941 - Wording cleanup; nothing to do.</li>
-<li>2944 - Wording cleanup; nothing to do. </li>
-<li>2945 - Synopsis was wrong; code was fine. <i>Fixed in r317063</i></li>
-<li>2948 - </li>
-<li>2950 - Patch ready</li>
-<li>2952 - Patch ready</li>
-<li>2953 - Probably just wording; check to be sure.</li>
-<li>2964 - At the very least, it needs a test.</li>
-<li>2965 - Eric? </li>
-<li>2972 - We already do this</li>
-<li>2976 - Looks simple. </li>
-<li>2977 - We haven't implemented p0083r3 yet (Splicing Maps and Sets), so we don't have <tt>merge</tt> for those containers yet</li>
-<li>2978 - Straightforward. </li>
-<li>2979 - <i>Test added in revision 316969</i></li>
-<li>2980 - Needs code changes and tests</li>
-<li>2981 - We need to finish the deduction guides before doing this</li>
-<li>2982 - We need to finish the deduction guides before doing this</li>
-<li>2988 - Simple; once we rewrite <atomic> </li>
-<li>2993 - </li>
-<li>2998 - Wording cleanup; nothing to do. </li>
-<li>3001 - Looks simple. </li>
-<li>3024 - </li>
+<li> 2164 - Writing tests here will be fun.</li>
+<li> 2243 - We already do this.</li>
+<li> 2816 - Wording changes only</li>
+<li> 2843 - We don't have PMRs yet</li>
+<li> 2849 - Eric? </li>
+<li> 2851 - Eric? </li>
+<li> 2969 - We don't have PMRs yet</li>
+<li> 2975 - We can do the scoped_ bit, but the PMR stuff will have to wait.</li>
+<li> 2989 - Eric? </li>
+<li> 3000 - We don't have PMRs yet</li>
+<li> 3002 - No networking TS implementation yet</li>
+<li> 3004 - Wording changes only</li>
+<li> 3005 - We don't have shared_ptr support for arrays yet</li>
+<li> 3007 - <i>Looks easy</i></li>
+<li> 3009 - We do this already; tests added in r323719</li>
+<li> 3010 - No networking TS implementation yet</li>
+<li> 3013 - Eric? </li>
+<li> 3014 - Eric? </li>
+<li> 3015 - Eric? </li>
+<li> 3017 - We don't do the splicing stuff yet</li>
+<li> 3020 - No networking TS implementation yet</li>
+<li> 3026 - I think this is just wording cleanup - Eric?</li>
+<li> 3030 - Wording changes only?? Do we handle exceptions correctly here?</li>
+<li> 3034 - Need to check if our tests are correct.</li>
+<li> 3035 - <i>Easy to do</i></li>
+<li> 3039 - We should implement P0777 first.</li>
+<li> 3041 - We should implement P0777 first.</li>
+<li> 3042 - We already do this.</li>
+<li> 3043 - We have a 'TODO(ericwf)' here</li>
+<li> 3045 - We haven't done the <atomic> rework yet.</li>
+<li> 3048 - We haven't done the parallel algorithms yet.</li>
 </ul>
 
-<p>Last Updated: 28-Jun-2017</p>
+<p>Last Updated: 29-Jan-2018</p>
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>


