[PATCH] D41507: avxintrin.h documentation fixes and updates

[Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

lebedev.ri added inline comments.


================
Comment at: lib/Headers/avxintrin.h:1668
 ///    operation to use: \n
-///    0x00 : Equal (ordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x01 : Less-than (ordered, signaling)
-///    0x02 : Less-than-or-equal (ordered, signaling)
-///    0x03 : Unordered (non-signaling)
-///    0x04 : Not-equal (unordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x05 : Not-less-than (unordered, signaling)
-///    0x06 : Not-less-than-or-equal (unordered, signaling)
-///    0x07 : Ordered (non-signaling)
-///    0x08 : Equal (unordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x09 : Not-greater-than-or-equal (unordered, signaling)
-///    0x0a : Not-greater-than (unordered, signaling)
-///    0x0b : False (ordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x0c : Not-equal (ordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x0d : Greater-than-or-equal (ordered, signaling)
-///    0x0e : Greater-than (ordered, signaling)
-///    0x0f : True (unordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x10 : Equal (ordered, signaling)
-///    0x11 : Less-than (ordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x12 : Less-than-or-equal (ordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x13 : Unordered (signaling)
-///    0x14 : Not-equal (unordered, signaling)
-///    0x15 : Not-less-than (unordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x16 : Not-less-than-or-equal (unordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x17 : Ordered (signaling)
-///    0x18 : Equal (unordered, signaling)
-///    0x19 : Not-greater-than-or-equal (unordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x1a : Not-greater-than (unordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x1b : False (ordered, signaling)
-///    0x1c : Not-equal (ordered, signaling)
-///    0x1d : Greater-than-or-equal (ordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x1e : Greater-than (ordered, non-signaling)
-///    0x1f : True (unordered, signaling)
+///    00h: Equal (ordered, non-signaling) \n
+///    01h: Less-than (ordered, signaling) \n
----------------
While i'm incompetent to actually review this, i have a question.
//Why// replace code-friendly `0x00` with `00h`?
And, //why// is this hex in the first place? Why not decimals?



https://reviews.llvm.org/D41507