[PATCH] D38171: [clang-tidy] Implement clang-tidy check aliases

[Malcolm Parsons via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

malcolm.parsons added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D38171#927045, @alexfh wrote:

> The only place I can think of, where -checks=* is useful is in combination with -list-checks, where the presence of clang-diagnostic- entries would be desired anyway.


Can we replace -list-checks with -list-enabled-checks and -list-all-checks?  The current behaviour is confusing and recently caused Chandler to abandon a clang-tidy demo.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D38171