[PATCH] D34277: [analyzer] Bump default performance thresholds?

[Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

NoQ added a comment.

This was an mixture of internal apple projects (user apps, drivers, deamons, whatever) with a relatively balanced selection of languages and levels of analyzer adoption. They amounted to ~16 hours of analysis CPU time (i.e. 4 hours on a quad-core machine per run). I've also ran it on LLVM separately, and had similar observations. I'm totally welcoming the feedback from other codebases!

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34277#782605, @zaks.anna wrote:

> > Maybe we should introduce another UMK_* for deeper analysis instead?
>
> The difference here is not substantial enough to warrant a new level. The general motivation for bumping these numbers is that we've set the timeouts many years ago and the hardware improved quite a bit since then.


Yeah, the point was mostly about default settings, for people who don't bother to tweak them, and adding more options essentially defeats the purpose.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D34277