[PATCH] D34277: [analyzer] Bump default performance thresholds?

Anna Zaks via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jun 16 12:08:44 PDT 2017

zaks.anna added a comment.

> Maybe we should introduce another UMK_* for deeper analysis instead?

The difference here is not substantial enough to warrant a new level. The general motivation for bumping these numbers is that we've set the timeouts many years ago and the hardware improved quite a bit since then.


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list