[PATCH] D29839: [clang-tidy] New misc-istream-overflow check

[Piotr Padlewski via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

Prazek added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29839#674301, @xazax.hun wrote:

> Shouldn't this be a path sensitive check within the clang static analyzer instead? So branches are properly handled and interprocedural analysis is done.


Do you have some examples? I would argue, that even if you would have code that firstly uses width(), and then after a while reads input, then this is bugprone, and probably the line initializing width should be just before reading.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D29839