[libcxx] r291961 - Add _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_WARNING and _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_ERROR macros.
Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 23 15:35:35 PST 2017
> I like the idea of tagging diagnose_ifs with tags, though I wonder how
this could be made applicable to code outside of libcxx. Specifically, if I
import some big library that uses diagnose_if, then I'd still need to use
`-Wno-user-defined-warnings` if said lib had a single diagnose_if that I
didn't want to fix immediately.
Yeah, we absolutely want this code to be applicable outside of libc++,
other libraries and their users will have the same need to
tag/enable/disable warnings separately.
However I do want a little special behavior for libc++. Specifically I
dislike that libc++ warnings are part of -Wuser-defined-warnings, since it
should be considered part
of the C++ implementation, and not part of "user-code". Instead I would
greatly appreciate if libc++ had its own top-level warning group
-Wstandard-library-warnings, since
many of the diagnostics it generates will be about violations of the C++
standard. Also when other libraries start using diagnose_if I don't want
the libc++ warnings
getting suppressed when a user adds -Wno-user-defined-warnings to disable
diagnostics produced elsewhere.
I'm not sure what the best way to achieve this, but that's my rational for
wanting it.
> If not this, then I'd like to at least consider some kind of wildcarding
thing in the warning flag, since libraries will likely roll their own
tag-namespaces anyway to avoid things like:
Libc++ defines some symbols within the global namespace, and we'll need a
way to group those as part of libc++ as well.
/Eric
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:06 PM, George Burgess <gbiv at google.com> wrote:
> I like the idea of tagging diagnose_ifs with tags, though I wonder how
> this could be made applicable to code outside of libcxx. Specifically, if I
> import some big library that uses diagnose_if, then I'd still need to use
> `-Wno-user-defined-warnings` if said lib had a single diagnose_if that I
> didn't want to fix immediately.
>
> My thought is that we may be able to tag these IDs with namespaces, and we
> can match against those in the -Wno-user-defined-warnings=whatever.
>
> For example:
>
> namespace std {
> void foo(int i) __attribute__((diagnose_if(i, "oh no", "warning",
> "foo_tag")));
> void bar(int i) __attribute__((diagnose_if(i, "oh no", "warning",
> "bar_tag")));
> }
>
> -Wno-user-defined-warnings='std::' // all diagnose_ifs in std:: are
> disabled
> -Wno-user-defined-warnings='std::foo_tag' // std::bar can warn
> -Wno-user-defined-warnings='std::foo_tag,std::bar_tag' // neither
> std::foo nor std::bar warn
>
> If not this, then I'd like to at least consider some kind of wildcarding
> thing in the warning flag, since libraries will likely roll their own
> tag-namespaces anyway to avoid things like:
>
> namespace boost {
> void foo(int i) __attribute__((diagnose_if(i, "oh no", "warning",
> "foo")));
> }
> namespace internal_lib {
> void foo(int i) __attribute__((diagnose_if(i, "oh no", "warning",
> "foo")));
> }
>
> -Wno-user-defined-warnings='foo' // disables boost::foo and
> internal_lib::foo's warnings.
>
> To be clear, I'm imagining the wildcards would look something like
>
> #define _LIBCXX_TAG "libcxx_warning_"
> namespace std {
> void foo(int i) __attribute__((diagnose_if(i, "oh no", "warning",
> _LIBCXX_TAG "foo_tag")));
> void bar(int i) __attribute__((diagnose_if(i, "oh no", "warning",
> _LIBCXX_TAG "bar_tag")));
> }
>
> -Wno-user-defined-warnings='libcxx_warning*' // std::foo and std::bar
> warnings are disabled
> -Wno-user-defined-warnings='libcxx_warning_foo_tag' // std::bar can warn
> -Wno-user-defined-warnings='libcxx_warning_foo_tag,libcxx_warning_bar_tag'
> // neither std::foo nor std::bar warn
>
> ...Personally, I'm leaning toward the implicit namespacing, since it's
> impossible to forget (e.g. a library that doesn't use tags can be disabled
> with 'lib_namespace::', instead of having to disable all user-defined
> warnings), but I'd be content with either.
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> My dream, and something I would like to work towards is supporting
>> something like this:
>>
>>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote:
>
>> My dream, and something I would like to work towards is supporting
>> something like this:
>>
>> > [[clang::libcxx_diagnose_if(cond, "message", "warning", /*
>> warning-id*/ "non-const-functor")]]
>> >
>> > -Wno-libcxx-warnings=non-const-functor
>>
>> This way libc++ warnings get treated differently from all other users of
>> diagnose_if, and can be enabled
>> and disabled separately.
>>
>> @George does this sound like a reasonable goal? If so I'm happy to start
>> working on this.
>>
>> /Eric
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:46 AM, George Burgess <gbiv at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The only plan that we have at the moment is basically for a
>>> -Wno-user-defined-warnings-in-system-headers type of flag. I agree that
>>> it would be nice if we could be more granular than this, so I'll think
>>> about what we can do.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This happens to fire in practice in protobuf. It's probably a true
>>>> positive and it's cool that this warning found it, but it means we have to
>>>> disable Wuser-defined-warnings for a bit -- which then disables all of
>>>> these user-defined warnings. Right now there aren't any others, but it
>>>> feels like we'd want to have the ability to turn individual user-defined
>>>> warnings on or off instead of just having a single toggle for all of them.
>>>> Are there plans for something like that?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits <
>>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Author: ericwf
>>>>> Date: Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> New Revision: 291961
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=291961&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Add _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_WARNING and _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_ERROR macros.
>>>>>
>>>>> Clang recently added a `diagnose_if(cond, msg, type)` attribute
>>>>> which can be used to generate diagnostics when `cond` is a constant
>>>>> expression that evaluates to true. Otherwise no attribute has no
>>>>> effect.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch adds _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_ERROR/WARNING macros which
>>>>> use this new attribute. Additionally this patch implements
>>>>> a diagnostic message when a non-const-callable comparator is
>>>>> given to a container.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note: For now the warning version of the diagnostic is useless
>>>>> within libc++ since warning diagnostics are suppressed by the
>>>>> system header pragma. I'm going to work on fixing this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Added:
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/containers/associative/non_const_co
>>>>> mparator.fail.cpp
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/docs/UsingLibcxx.rst
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/include/__config
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/include/__tree
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/include/map
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/include/type_traits
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/compiler.py
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/test/config.py
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/test/format.py
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/diagnos
>>>>> e_reference_binding.fail.cpp
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/docs/UsingLibcxx.rst
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/docs/UsingL
>>>>> ibcxx.rst?rev=291961&r1=291960&r2=291961&view=diff
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/docs/UsingLibcxx.rst (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/docs/UsingLibcxx.rst Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> @@ -173,3 +173,10 @@ thread safety annotations.
>>>>> return Tup{"hello world", 42}; // explicit constructor called.
>>>>> OK.
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +**_LIBCPP_DISABLE_ADDITIONAL_DIAGNOSTICS**:
>>>>> + This macro disables the additional diagnostics generated by libc++
>>>>> using the
>>>>> + `diagnose_if` attribute. These additional diagnostics include
>>>>> checks for:
>>>>> +
>>>>> + * Giving `set`, `map`, `multiset`, `multimap` a comparator which
>>>>> is not
>>>>> + const callable.
>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/include/__config
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/__c
>>>>> onfig?rev=291961&r1=291960&r2=291961&view=diff
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/include/__config (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/include/__config Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> @@ -1006,6 +1006,16 @@ _LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS extern "C" void __sanit
>>>>> #endif
>>>>> #endif
>>>>>
>>>>> +#if __has_attribute(diagnose_if) && !defined(_LIBCPP_DISABLE_ADDIT
>>>>> IONAL_DIAGNOSTICS)
>>>>> +# define _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_WARNING(...) \
>>>>> + __attribute__((__diagnose_if__(__VA_ARGS__, "warning")))
>>>>> +# define _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_ERROR(...) \
>>>>> + __attribute__((__diagnose_if__(__VA_ARGS__, "error")))
>>>>> +#else
>>>>> +# define _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_WARNING(...)
>>>>> +# define _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_ERROR(...)
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> +
>>>>> #endif // __cplusplus
>>>>>
>>>>> #endif // _LIBCPP_CONFIG
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/include/__tree
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/__t
>>>>> ree?rev=291961&r1=291960&r2=291961&view=diff
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/include/__tree (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/include/__tree Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ template <class _Key, class _Value>
>>>>> struct __value_type;
>>>>> #endif
>>>>>
>>>>> +template <class _Key, class _CP, class _Compare,
>>>>> + bool = is_empty<_Compare>::value && !__libcpp_is_final<_Compare>::
>>>>> value>
>>>>> +class __map_value_compare;
>>>>> +
>>>>> template <class _Allocator> class __map_node_destructor;
>>>>> template <class _TreeIterator> class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS
>>>>> __map_iterator;
>>>>> template <class _TreeIterator> class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS
>>>>> __map_const_iterator;
>>>>> @@ -955,6 +959,30 @@ private:
>>>>>
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> +#ifndef _LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG
>>>>> +template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
>>>>> +struct __diagnose_tree_helper {
>>>>> + static constexpr bool __trigger_diagnostics()
>>>>> + _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_WARNING(!__is_const_comparable<_Compare,
>>>>> _Tp>::value,
>>>>> + "the specified comparator type does not provide a const
>>>>> call operator")
>>>>> + { return true; }
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +template <class _Key, class _Value, class _KeyComp, class _Alloc>
>>>>> +struct __diagnose_tree_helper<
>>>>> + __value_type<_Key, _Value>,
>>>>> + __map_value_compare<_Key, __value_type<_Key, _Value>, _KeyComp>,
>>>>> + _Alloc
>>>>> +>
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + static constexpr bool __trigger_diagnostics()
>>>>> + _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_WARNING(!__is_const_comparable<_KeyComp,
>>>>> _Key>::value,
>>>>> + "the specified comparator type does not provide a const
>>>>> call operator")
>>>>> + { return true; }
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> +
>>>>> template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
>>>>> class __tree
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -1787,7 +1815,11 @@ __tree<_Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>::~__tr
>>>>> {
>>>>> static_assert((is_copy_constructible<value_compare>::value),
>>>>> "Comparator must be copy-constructible.");
>>>>> - destroy(__root());
>>>>> +#ifndef _LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG
>>>>> + static_assert((__diagnose_tree_helper<_Tp, _Compare,
>>>>> _Allocator>::
>>>>> + __trigger_diagnostics()), "");
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> + destroy(__root());
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> template <class _Tp, class _Compare, class _Allocator>
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/include/map
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/map
>>>>> ?rev=291961&r1=291960&r2=291961&view=diff
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/include/map (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/include/map Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> @@ -453,9 +453,7 @@ swap(multimap<Key, T, Compare, Allocator
>>>>>
>>>>> _LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
>>>>>
>>>>> -template <class _Key, class _CP, class _Compare,
>>>>> - bool = is_empty<_Compare>::value &&
>>>>> !__libcpp_is_final<_Compare>::value
>>>>> - >
>>>>> +template <class _Key, class _CP, class _Compare, bool _IsSmall>
>>>>> class __map_value_compare
>>>>> : private _Compare
>>>>> {
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/include/type_traits
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/typ
>>>>> e_traits?rev=291961&r1=291960&r2=291961&view=diff
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/include/type_traits (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/include/type_traits Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> @@ -4715,6 +4715,15 @@ struct __can_extract_map_key<_ValTy, _Ke
>>>>>
>>>>> #endif
>>>>>
>>>>> +template <class _Comp, class _ValueType, class = void>
>>>>> +struct __is_const_comparable : false_type {};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +template <class _Comp, class _ValueType>
>>>>> +struct __is_const_comparable<_Comp, _ValueType, typename __void_t<
>>>>> + decltype(_VSTD::declval<_Comp const&>()(_VSTD::declval<_ValueType
>>>>> const&>(),
>>>>> + _VSTD::declval<_ValueType
>>>>> const&>()))
>>>>> + >::type> : true_type {};
>>>>> +
>>>>> _LIBCPP_END_NAMESPACE_STD
>>>>>
>>>>> #endif // _LIBCPP_TYPE_TRAITS
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/compiler.py
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx
>>>>> /compiler.py?rev=291961&r1=291960&r2=291961&view=diff
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/compiler.py (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/compiler.py Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ class CXXCompiler(object):
>>>>>
>>>>> def addWarningFlagIfSupported(self, flag):
>>>>> if self.hasWarningFlag(flag):
>>>>> - assert flag not in self.warning_flags
>>>>> - self.warning_flags += [flag]
>>>>> + if flag not in self.warning_flags:
>>>>> + self.warning_flags += [flag]
>>>>> return True
>>>>> return False
>>>>>
>>>>> Added: libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/containers/associative/non_const_co
>>>>> mparator.fail.cpp
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx
>>>>> /containers/associative/non_const_comparator.fail.cpp?rev=29
>>>>> 1961&view=auto
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/containers/associative/non_const_comparator.fail.cpp
>>>>> (added)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/containers/associative/non_const_comparator.fail.cpp
>>>>> Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>>>>> +//===------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ----------------===//
>>>>> +//
>>>>> +// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
>>>>> +//
>>>>> +// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of
>>>>> Illinois Open
>>>>> +// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
>>>>> +//
>>>>> +//===------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ----------------===//
>>>>> +
>>>>> +// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03
>>>>> +// REQUIRES: diagnose-if-support, verify-support
>>>>> +
>>>>> +// Test that libc++ generates a warning diagnostic when the container
>>>>> is
>>>>> +// provided a non-const callable comparator.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#include <set>
>>>>> +#include <map>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +struct BadCompare {
>>>>> + template <class T, class U>
>>>>> + bool operator()(T const& t, U const& u) {
>>>>> + return t < u;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +int main() {
>>>>> + static_assert(!std::__is_const_comparable<BadCompare, int>::value,
>>>>> "");
>>>>> + // expected-warning at __tree:* 4 {{the specified comparator type
>>>>> does not provide a const call operator}}
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + using C = std::set<int, BadCompare>;
>>>>> + C s;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + using C = std::multiset<long, BadCompare>;
>>>>> + C s;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + using C = std::map<int, int, BadCompare>;
>>>>> + C s;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + using C = std::multimap<long, int, BadCompare>;
>>>>> + C s;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +}
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/test/config.py
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx
>>>>> /test/config.py?rev=291961&r1=291960&r2=291961&view=diff
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/test/config.py (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/test/config.py Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> @@ -712,33 +712,35 @@ class Configuration(object):
>>>>> ['c++11', 'c++14', 'c++1z'])) != 0
>>>>> enable_warnings = self.get_lit_bool('enable_warnings',
>>>>> default_enable_warnings)
>>>>> - if enable_warnings:
>>>>> - self.cxx.useWarnings(True)
>>>>> - self.cxx.warning_flags += [
>>>>> - '-D_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER',
>>>>> - '-Wall', '-Wextra', '-Werror'
>>>>> - ]
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wshadow')
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSuppo
>>>>> rted('-Wno-unused-command-line-argument')
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wno-attributes')
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSuppo
>>>>> rted('-Wno-pessimizing-move')
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSuppo
>>>>> rted('-Wno-c++11-extensions')
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSuppo
>>>>> rted('-Wno-user-defined-literals')
>>>>> - # These warnings should be enabled in order to support
>>>>> the MSVC
>>>>> - # team using the test suite; They enable the warnings
>>>>> below and
>>>>> - # expect the test suite to be clean.
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wsign-compare')
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wunused-variable')
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wunused-parameter')
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wunreachable-code')
>>>>> - # FIXME: Enable the two warnings below.
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wno-conversion')
>>>>> + self.cxx.useWarnings(enable_warnings)
>>>>> + self.cxx.warning_flags += [
>>>>> + '-D_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER',
>>>>> + '-Wall', '-Wextra', '-Werror'
>>>>> + ]
>>>>> + if self.cxx.hasWarningFlag('-Wuser-defined-warnings'):
>>>>> + self.cxx.warning_flags += ['-Wuser-defined-warnings']
>>>>> + self.config.available_features.add('diagnose-if-support')
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wshadow')
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wno-unused-command-line
>>>>> -argument')
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wno-attributes')
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wno-pessimizing-move')
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wno-c++11-extensions')
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wno-user-defined-litera
>>>>> ls')
>>>>> + # These warnings should be enabled in order to support the
>>>>> MSVC
>>>>> + # team using the test suite; They enable the warnings below
>>>>> and
>>>>> + # expect the test suite to be clean.
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wsign-compare')
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wunused-variable')
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wunused-parameter')
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wunreachable-code')
>>>>> + # FIXME: Enable the two warnings below.
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wno-conversion')
>>>>> + self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupported('-Wno-unused-local-typede
>>>>> f')
>>>>> + std = self.get_lit_conf('std', None)
>>>>> + if std in ['c++98', 'c++03']:
>>>>> + # The '#define static_assert' provided by libc++ in C++03
>>>>> mode
>>>>> + # causes an unused local typedef whenever it is used.
>>>>> self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSupp
>>>>> orted('-Wno-unused-local-typedef')
>>>>> - std = self.get_lit_conf('std', None)
>>>>> - if std in ['c++98', 'c++03']:
>>>>> - # The '#define static_assert' provided by libc++ in
>>>>> C++03 mode
>>>>> - # causes an unused local typedef whenever it is used.
>>>>> - self.cxx.addWarningFlagIfSuppo
>>>>> rted('-Wno-unused-local-typedef')
>>>>>
>>>>> def configure_sanitizer(self):
>>>>> san = self.get_lit_conf('use_sanitizer', '').strip()
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/test/format.py
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx
>>>>> /test/format.py?rev=291961&r1=291960&r2=291961&view=diff
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/test/format.py (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/test/format.py Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> @@ -223,6 +223,10 @@ class LibcxxTestFormat(object):
>>>>> test_cxx.flags += ['-fsyntax-only']
>>>>> if use_verify:
>>>>> test_cxx.useVerify()
>>>>> + test_cxx.useWarnings()
>>>>> + if '-Wuser-defined-warnings' in test_cxx.warning_flags:
>>>>> + test_cxx.warning_flags +=
>>>>> ['-Wno-error=user-defined-warnings']
>>>>> +
>>>>> cmd, out, err, rc = test_cxx.compile(source_path,
>>>>> out=os.devnull)
>>>>> expected_rc = 0 if use_verify else 1
>>>>> if rc == expected_rc:
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/diagnos
>>>>> e_reference_binding.fail.cpp
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx
>>>>> /utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/diagnose_reference_binding.fail
>>>>> .cpp?rev=291961&r1=291960&r2=291961&view=diff
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/diagnose_reference_binding.fail.cpp
>>>>> (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/diagnose_reference_binding.fail.cpp
>>>>> Fri Jan 13 16:02:08 2017
>>>>> @@ -30,4 +30,11 @@ int main() {
>>>>> // bind rvalue to constructed non-rvalue
>>>>> std::tuple<std::string &&> t2("hello"); // expected-note
>>>>> {{requested here}}
>>>>> std::tuple<std::string &&> t3(std::allocator_arg, alloc,
>>>>> "hello"); // expected-note {{requested here}}
>>>>> +
>>>>> + // FIXME: The below warnings may get emitted as an error, a
>>>>> warning, or not emitted at all
>>>>> + // depending on the flags used to compile this test.
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + // expected-warning at tuple:* 0+ {{binding reference member
>>>>> 'value' to a temporary value}}
>>>>> + // expected-error at tuple:* 0+ {{binding reference member 'value'
>>>>> to a temporary value}}
>>>>> + }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20170123/1b4402b0/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list