[PATCH] D28785: Split exception.cpp and new.cpp implementation into different files for different runtimes

[Eric Fiselier via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

EricWF added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28785#651156, @EricWF wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28785#650101, @compnerd wrote:
>
> > While I love this direction (the original version really was an unintelligible pile of code), I really think that this change may be taking on too much.  Why not split it up first and do nothing else.  We could do the MS ABI implementation in a subsequent change.  This would improve the code and would not be gated on the MS ABI changes.
>
>
> I agree this review is taking on too much, it started out much smaller and I tried to avoid expanding it, but in the end I had three options:
>
> A) Regress and remove all support for MSVC, this would break the windows build. (at least in `exception.cpp` and `new.cpp`).
>  B) Implement incorrect versions of `support/runtime/<header>_msvc.ipp`  based on w/e we currently have, just to keep Windows building.
>  C) Implement correct versions of `support/runtime/<header>_msvc.ipp`.
>
> I choose (C) since I didn't want to regress Windows, or spend time implementing incorrect `<header>_msvc.ipp` versions.
>  However I'm willing to try and shrink this down if you think that would be better.


That's dumb, and I'm dumb. I should be perfectly capable of breaking this down into smaller pieces


https://reviews.llvm.org/D28785