[PATCH] D26458: Protect nested-exceptions tests under no-exceptions

[Roger Ferrer Ibanez via cfe-commits]

rogfer01 added a comment.

@rmaprath well each case is testing a different special member: the assignment operator, the copy constructor and the default constructor. My feeling is that at least the non-throwing part must be tested under no-exceptions. But I understand, that this class is probably useless in the context of no-exceptions.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D26458