[PATCH] D24979: [CUDA] Support <complex> and std::min/max on the device.

[Justin Lebar via cfe-commits]

jlebar added a comment.

> I' personally would prefer to force-include these files. I suspect it will not change things much as we already include a lot.


We have already had bugs filed by users whose root cause was that we #included more things than nvcc #includes.  I know exact compatibility with nvcc is not our goal, but unless we have a good reason I don't think we should break compatibility with nvcc *and* the C++ standard by force-including additional system headers.

> This looks like fix-includes and it may be somewhat shaky if users start messing with include paths.


We add this include path first, so I think it should be OK?  What do you think, @echristo.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D24979