[PATCH] D22642: CodeGen: Clean up implementation of vtable initializer builder. NFC.
Richard Smith via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 7 18:44:18 PDT 2016
On 7 Sep 2016 6:23 pm, "Peter Collingbourne" <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote:
pcc marked 4 inline comments as done.
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp:588
@@ +587,3 @@
+ if (auto *F = dyn_cast<llvm::Function>(Cache))
+ Cache = llvm::ConstantExpr::getBitCast(Cache, CGM.Int8PtrTy);
> Do you have any idea why we're doing this? It looks wrong to me. These
ABI entry points are exposed and could certainly have their addresses taken
and used in this translation unit.
I introduced this in D18071. Although a translation unit can take the
address of one of these functions, that would involve declaring a function
with a reserved name, so I believe we'd be allowed to impose restrictions
such as `unnamed_addr` on the address.
These are declared by <cxxabi.h>, and thus presumably intended to be
useable by programs, so I'm not convinced that reasoning applies. Do we
gain anything from this?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-commits