[PATCH] D20811: [analyzer] Model some library functions

[Artem Dergachev via cfe-commits]

NoQ added a comment.

> Is it really a problem if the checker comments are part of the Doxygen documentation?


Of course not :) I've been mostly thinking about the benefits of the anonymous namespace itself (cleaner global scope, no name collisions, but even these benefits are extremely minor).


https://reviews.llvm.org/D20811