[PATCH] D20090: [OPENCL] Fix wrongly vla error for OpenCL array.

[Anastasia Stulova via cfe-commits]

Anastasia added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp:2055
@@ -2054,3 +2054,3 @@
 
-  return S.VerifyIntegerConstantExpression(ArraySize, &SizeVal, Diagnoser,
-                                           S.LangOpts.GNUMode).isInvalid();
+  return S
+      .VerifyIntegerConstantExpression(ArraySize, &SizeVal, Diagnoser,
----------------
Formatting looks weird though... may be better to leave the first line unmodified?

================
Comment at: test/CodeGenOpenCL/vla.cl:1
@@ +1,2 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -O0 -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -O0 -cl-std=CL2.0 -DCL20 -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CL20
----------------
Could we have a Sema test instead where we accept the VLA if constant AS object is used and give an error otherwise?

Also do we need to test CL2.0? We don't seem to be doing anything different for that version. 


http://reviews.llvm.org/D20090