[PATCH] D19175: Fix for PR27015 (variable template initialized with a generic lambda expression)

Richard Smith via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 29 12:13:15 PDT 2016


On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Scope’s constructor passes the parameter ScopeFlags to Scope::Init, which
> calls setFlags(Scope *parent, unsigned flags) and setFlags initializes
> Scope::Flags to the value passed to the constructor.
>

Right, but you're making setFlags assert (F != Flags), at which point Flags
is presumably uninitialized if the constructor didn't set it itself.


> On Apr 29, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> If I add an assert to check (F != Flags) in setFlags, 2700+ out of 5000+
>> clang regression tests fail. I haven’t figured out which parts of clang are
>> passing the same value to setFlags.
>>
>
> What are you initializing Flags to in the constructor?
>
>> On Apr 28, 2016, at 7:38 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits <
>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits <
>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> ahatanak added a comment.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review. I committed the patch in r267956 and r267975.
>>>
>>> Do you think I should make setFlags(unsigned F) return early if F ==
>>> Flags?
>>
>>
>> I don't think that should happen in practice, so it doesn't seem worth
>> checking.
>>
>> Repository:
>>>   rL LLVM
>>>
>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D19175
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20160429/74493027/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list