[PATCH] D15208: Patch for inline abort code generation

Alexey Samsonov via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 8 13:14:38 PST 2015


samsonov added a comment.

That is, I presume it's highly unlikely user will need to have fine-grained setup for deciding which UBSan checks should be merged, and which should not. So, probably having a single `-fsanitize-merge-traps`  / `-fno-sanitize-merge-traps` option would be enough. I'd like to hear other opinions, though.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15208#305199, @eugenis wrote:

> Better -fsanitize-merge-checks, and it should apply to non-trap checks as well (i.e. SIGILL address should uniquely correspond to the failure source location).


Just to make sure I understand it, you suggest to eventually pass it down to ASan/MSan instrumentation passes?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D15208





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list