[PATCH] D15174: [MSVC] Fix for http://llvm.org/PR25636: indexed accessor property not supported correctly.

[John McCall via cfe-commits]

rjmccall added a comment.

Oh, I see, of course.

It would be clearer if you asked the subclass which value to use abstractly (i.e. independently of the actual set expression) and then passed down captureSetValueAsResult=false when the subclass says to use the setter result.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D15174