[clang-tools-extra] r248797 - Some of the build bots are unhappy about the overload of the global operator new() because it was accidentally marked noexcept instead of noexcept(false). This should correct those bots.

[Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits]

Author: aaronballman
Date: Tue Sep 29 09:26:00 2015
New Revision: 248797

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=248797&view=rev
Log:
Some of the build bots are unhappy about the overload of the global operator new() because it was accidentally marked noexcept instead of noexcept(false). This should correct those bots.

Modified:
    clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/misc-new-delete-overloads.cpp

Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/misc-new-delete-overloads.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/misc-new-delete-overloads.cpp?rev=248797&r1=248796&r2=248797&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/misc-new-delete-overloads.cpp (original)
+++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/misc-new-delete-overloads.cpp Tue Sep 29 09:26:00 2015
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ struct S {
 };
 
 // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:7: warning: declaration of 'operator new' has no matching declaration of 'operator delete' at the same scope
-void *operator new(size_t size) noexcept;
+void *operator new(size_t size) noexcept(false);
 
 struct T {
   // Sized deallocations are not enabled by default, and so this new/delete pair