r247618 - C11 _Bool bitfield diagnostic
Richard Smith via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 14 18:01:26 PDT 2015
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:55 PM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:31 PM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits <
>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Nico Weber via cfe-commits <
>>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This also fires for bool in C++ files, even though the commit message
>>>>> saying C11 and _Bool. Given the test changes, I suppose that's intentional?
>>>>> This fires a lot on existing code, for example protobuf:
>>>>>
>>>>> ../../third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/extension_set.h:465:10:
>>>>> error: width of bit-field 'is_cleared' (4 bits) exceeds the width of its
>>>>> type; value will be truncated to 1 bit [-Werror,-Wbitfield-width]
>>>>> bool is_cleared : 4;
>>>>> ^
>>>>> ../../third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/extension_set.h:472:10:
>>>>> error: width of bit-field 'is_lazy' (4 bits) exceeds the width of its type;
>>>>> value will be truncated to 1 bit [-Werror,-Wbitfield-width]
>>>>> bool is_lazy : 4;
>>>>> ^
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this expected? Is this a behavior change, or did the truncation
>>>>> happen previously and it's now just getting warned on?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The code previously assumed that MSVC used the C rules here; it appears
>>>> that's not true in all cases.
>>>>
>>>> Can we just remove the " || IsMsStruct || Context.getTargetInfo().getCXXABI().isMicrosoft()"?
>>>> Is there some reason we need to prohibit overwide bitfields for MS bitfield
>>>> layout, rather than just warning on them? (Does record layout fail somehow?)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Record layout will fail for stuff like 'int x : 33' but will not fail
>>> for stuff like '{bool,_Bool} y : 2'; the bitfield layout algorithm cares
>>> about the storage size (which, of course, includes padding). This patch
>>> makes 'bool y : 2' an error which is a behavior change, I'm working on
>>> patch to address this.
>>>
>>
>> Do we need to be compatible with this MSVC bug? It would seem feasible to
>> teach our MS record layout to do the right thing with over-wide bitfields
>> and downgrade this to the normal warning in C++.
>>
>
> It is possible to add support for over-wide bitfields but this is not
> completely trivial. There is a fair amount of code in Clang which deals
> with emission of bitfields (RecordLayoutBuilder,
> CGRecordLayoutBuilder, ConstStructBuilder) and I don't think I have the
> bandwidth to audit the impact of such a change right now.
>
This all already works for Itanium record layout, so presumably only the
MS-layout-specific side would need to be implemented?
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Rachel Craik via cfe-commits <
>>>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Author: rcraik
>>>>>> Date: Mon Sep 14 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> New Revision: 247618
>>>>>>
>>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=247618&view=rev
>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>> C11 _Bool bitfield diagnostic
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Summary: Implement DR262 (for C). This patch will mainly affect
>>>>>> bitfields of type _Bool
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewers: fraggamuffin, rsmith
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Subscribers: hubert.reinterpretcast, cfe-commits
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10018
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/bitfield-2.c
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/warn-padded-packed.cpp
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/test/Misc/warning-flags.c
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/test/Sema/bitfield.c
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/bitfield-layout.cpp
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/ms_wide_bitfield.cpp
>>>>>> cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/class-bitfield.m
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td Mon Sep 14
>>>>>> 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ def AutoImport : DiagGroup<"auto-import"
>>>>>> def GNUBinaryLiteral : DiagGroup<"gnu-binary-literal">;
>>>>>> def GNUCompoundLiteralInitializer :
>>>>>> DiagGroup<"gnu-compound-literal-initializer">;
>>>>>> def BitFieldConstantConversion :
>>>>>> DiagGroup<"bitfield-constant-conversion">;
>>>>>> +def BitFieldWidth : DiagGroup<"bitfield-width">;
>>>>>> def ConstantConversion :
>>>>>> DiagGroup<"constant-conversion", [ BitFieldConstantConversion ] >;
>>>>>> def LiteralConversion : DiagGroup<"literal-conversion">;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td Mon Sep 14
>>>>>> 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> @@ -4314,20 +4314,21 @@ def err_bitfield_has_negative_width : Er
>>>>>> def err_anon_bitfield_has_negative_width : Error<
>>>>>> "anonymous bit-field has negative width (%0)">;
>>>>>> def err_bitfield_has_zero_width : Error<"named bit-field %0 has zero
>>>>>> width">;
>>>>>> -def err_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size : Error<
>>>>>> - "size of bit-field %0 (%1 bits) exceeds size of its type (%2
>>>>>> bits)">;
>>>>>> -def err_anon_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size : Error<
>>>>>> - "size of anonymous bit-field (%0 bits) exceeds size of its type
>>>>>> (%1 bits)">;
>>>>>> +def err_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width : Error<
>>>>>> + "width of bit-field %0 (%1 bits) exceeds width of its type (%2
>>>>>> bit%s2)">;
>>>>>> +def err_anon_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width : Error<
>>>>>> + "width of anonymous bit-field (%0 bits) exceeds width of its type "
>>>>>> + "(%1 bit%s1)">;
>>>>>> def err_incorrect_number_of_vector_initializers : Error<
>>>>>> "number of elements must be either one or match the size of the
>>>>>> vector">;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> // Used by C++ which allows bit-fields that are wider than the type.
>>>>>> -def warn_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size: Warning<
>>>>>> - "size of bit-field %0 (%1 bits) exceeds the size of its type;
>>>>>> value will be "
>>>>>> - "truncated to %2 bits">;
>>>>>> -def warn_anon_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size : Warning<
>>>>>> - "size of anonymous bit-field (%0 bits) exceeds size of its type;
>>>>>> value will "
>>>>>> - "be truncated to %1 bits">;
>>>>>> +def warn_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width: Warning<
>>>>>> + "width of bit-field %0 (%1 bits) exceeds the width of its type;
>>>>>> value will "
>>>>>> + "be truncated to %2 bit%s2">, InGroup<BitFieldWidth>;
>>>>>> +def warn_anon_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width : Warning<
>>>>>> + "width of anonymous bit-field (%0 bits) exceeds width of its type;
>>>>>> value "
>>>>>> + "will be truncated to %1 bit%s1">, InGroup<BitFieldWidth>;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> def warn_missing_braces : Warning<
>>>>>> "suggest braces around initialization of subobject">,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp Mon Sep 14 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> @@ -12625,26 +12625,26 @@ ExprResult Sema::VerifyBitField(SourceLo
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (!FieldTy->isDependentType()) {
>>>>>> - uint64_t TypeSize = Context.getTypeSize(FieldTy);
>>>>>> - if (Value.getZExtValue() > TypeSize) {
>>>>>> + uint64_t TypeWidth = Context.getIntWidth(FieldTy);
>>>>>> + if (Value.ugt(TypeWidth)) {
>>>>>> if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus || IsMsStruct ||
>>>>>> Context.getTargetInfo().getCXXABI().isMicrosoft()) {
>>>>>> if (FieldName)
>>>>>> - return Diag(FieldLoc,
>>>>>> diag::err_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size)
>>>>>> + return Diag(FieldLoc,
>>>>>> diag::err_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width)
>>>>>> << FieldName << (unsigned)Value.getZExtValue()
>>>>>> - << (unsigned)TypeSize;
>>>>>> + << (unsigned)TypeWidth;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - return Diag(FieldLoc,
>>>>>> diag::err_anon_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size)
>>>>>> - << (unsigned)Value.getZExtValue() << (unsigned)TypeSize;
>>>>>> + return Diag(FieldLoc,
>>>>>> diag::err_anon_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width)
>>>>>> + << (unsigned)Value.getZExtValue() << (unsigned)TypeWidth;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (FieldName)
>>>>>> - Diag(FieldLoc, diag::warn_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size)
>>>>>> + Diag(FieldLoc, diag::warn_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width)
>>>>>> << FieldName << (unsigned)Value.getZExtValue()
>>>>>> - << (unsigned)TypeSize;
>>>>>> + << (unsigned)TypeWidth;
>>>>>> else
>>>>>> - Diag(FieldLoc,
>>>>>> diag::warn_anon_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size)
>>>>>> - << (unsigned)Value.getZExtValue() << (unsigned)TypeSize;
>>>>>> + Diag(FieldLoc,
>>>>>> diag::warn_anon_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width)
>>>>>> + << (unsigned)Value.getZExtValue() << (unsigned)TypeWidth;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/bitfield-2.c
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/bitfield-2.c?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/bitfield-2.c (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/bitfield-2.c Mon Sep 14 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ unsigned long long test_5() {
>>>>>> /***/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct s6 {
>>>>>> - _Bool f0 : 2;
>>>>>> + unsigned f0 : 2;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct s6 g6 = { 0xF };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/warn-padded-packed.cpp
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/warn-padded-packed.cpp?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/warn-padded-packed.cpp (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/warn-padded-packed.cpp Mon Sep 14
>>>>>> 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct S12 {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct S13 { // expected-warning {{padding size of 'S13' with 6 bits
>>>>>> to alignment boundary}}
>>>>>> char c;
>>>>>> - bool b : 10; // expected-warning {{size of bit-field 'b' (10 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds the size of its type}}
>>>>>> + bool b : 10; // expected-warning {{width of bit-field 'b' (10
>>>>>> bits) exceeds the width of its type}}
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> // The warnings are emitted when the layout of the structs is
>>>>>> computed, so we have to use them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Misc/warning-flags.c
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Misc/warning-flags.c?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/Misc/warning-flags.c (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Misc/warning-flags.c Mon Sep 14 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This test serves two purposes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually
>>>>>> shrink to 0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -CHECK: Warnings without flags (92):
>>>>>> +CHECK: Warnings without flags (90):
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list
>>>>>> @@ -44,10 +44,8 @@ CHECK-NEXT: pp_pragma_once_in_main_fil
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT: pp_pragma_sysheader_in_main_file
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT: w_asm_qualifier_ignored
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT: warn_accessor_property_type_mismatch
>>>>>> -CHECK-NEXT: warn_anon_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT: warn_arcmt_nsalloc_realloc
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT: warn_asm_label_on_auto_decl
>>>>>> -CHECK-NEXT: warn_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT: warn_c_kext
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT:
>>>>>> warn_call_to_pure_virtual_member_function_from_ctor_dtor
>>>>>> CHECK-NEXT: warn_call_wrong_number_of_arguments
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/bitfield.c
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/bitfield.c?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/bitfield.c (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/bitfield.c Mon Sep 14 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ struct a {
>>>>>> int a : -1; // expected-error{{bit-field 'a' has negative width}}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> // rdar://6081627
>>>>>> - int b : 33; // expected-error{{size of bit-field 'b' (33 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds size of its type (32 bits)}}
>>>>>> + int b : 33; // expected-error{{width of bit-field 'b' (33 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds width of its type (32 bits)}}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int c : (1 + 0.25); // expected-error{{expression is not an
>>>>>> integer constant expression}}
>>>>>> int d : (int)(1 + 0.25);
>>>>>> @@ -22,9 +22,12 @@ struct a {
>>>>>> int g : (_Bool)1;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> // PR4017
>>>>>> - char : 10; // expected-error {{size of anonymous bit-field
>>>>>> (10 bits) exceeds size of its type (8 bits)}}
>>>>>> + char : 10; // expected-error {{width of anonymous bit-field
>>>>>> (10 bits) exceeds width of its type (8 bits)}}
>>>>>> unsigned : -2; // expected-error {{anonymous bit-field has
>>>>>> negative width (-2)}}
>>>>>> float : 12; // expected-error {{anonymous bit-field has
>>>>>> non-integral type 'float'}}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + _Bool : 2; // expected-error {{width of anonymous bit-field (2
>>>>>> bits) exceeds width of its type (1 bit)}}
>>>>>> + _Bool h : 5; // expected-error {{width of bit-field 'h' (5 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds width of its type (1 bit)}}
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct b {unsigned x : 2;} x;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/bitfield-layout.cpp
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/bitfield-layout.cpp?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/bitfield-layout.cpp (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/bitfield-layout.cpp Mon Sep 14 16:27:36
>>>>>> 2015
>>>>>> @@ -5,25 +5,25 @@
>>>>>>
>>>>>> // Simple tests.
>>>>>> struct Test1 {
>>>>>> - char c : 9; // expected-warning {{size of bit-field 'c' (9 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds the size of its type; value will be truncated to 8 bits}}
>>>>>> + char c : 9; // expected-warning {{width of bit-field 'c' (9 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds the width of its type; value will be truncated to 8 bits}}
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> CHECK_SIZE(Test1, 2);
>>>>>> CHECK_ALIGN(Test1, 1);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct Test2 {
>>>>>> - char c : 16; // expected-warning {{size of bit-field 'c' (16 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds the size of its type; value will be truncated to 8 bits}}
>>>>>> + char c : 16; // expected-warning {{width of bit-field 'c' (16
>>>>>> bits) exceeds the width of its type; value will be truncated to 8 bits}}
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> CHECK_SIZE(Test2, 2);
>>>>>> CHECK_ALIGN(Test2, 2);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct Test3 {
>>>>>> - char c : 32; // expected-warning {{size of bit-field 'c' (32 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds the size of its type; value will be truncated to 8 bits}}
>>>>>> + char c : 32; // expected-warning {{width of bit-field 'c' (32
>>>>>> bits) exceeds the width of its type; value will be truncated to 8 bits}}
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> CHECK_SIZE(Test3, 4);
>>>>>> CHECK_ALIGN(Test3, 4);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct Test4 {
>>>>>> - char c : 64; // expected-warning {{size of bit-field 'c' (64 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds the size of its type; value will be truncated to 8 bits}}
>>>>>> + char c : 64; // expected-warning {{width of bit-field 'c' (64
>>>>>> bits) exceeds the width of its type; value will be truncated to 8 bits}}
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> CHECK_SIZE(Test4, 8);
>>>>>> CHECK_ALIGN(Test4, 8);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp Mon Sep 14
>>>>>> 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> @@ -1801,9 +1801,9 @@ namespace Bitfields {
>>>>>> bool b : 1;
>>>>>> unsigned u : 5;
>>>>>> int n : 5;
>>>>>> - bool b2 : 3;
>>>>>> - unsigned u2 : 74; // expected-warning {{exceeds the size of its
>>>>>> type}}
>>>>>> - int n2 : 81; // expected-warning {{exceeds the size of its type}}
>>>>>> + bool b2 : 3; // expected-warning {{exceeds the width of its
>>>>>> type}}
>>>>>> + unsigned u2 : 74; // expected-warning {{exceeds the width of its
>>>>>> type}}
>>>>>> + int n2 : 81; // expected-warning {{exceeds the width of its
>>>>>> type}}
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> constexpr A a = { false, 33, 31, false, 0xffffffff, 0x7fffffff };
>>>>>> // expected-warning 2{{truncation}}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp Mon Sep 14
>>>>>> 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> @@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ namespace Lifetime {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> namespace Bitfields {
>>>>>> struct A {
>>>>>> - bool b : 3;
>>>>>> + bool b : 1;
>>>>>> int n : 4;
>>>>>> unsigned u : 5;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/ms_wide_bitfield.cpp
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/ms_wide_bitfield.cpp?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/ms_wide_bitfield.cpp (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/ms_wide_bitfield.cpp Mon Sep 14 16:27:36
>>>>>> 2015
>>>>>> @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
>>>>>> // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fno-rtti -emit-llvm-only -triple i686-pc-win32
>>>>>> -fdump-record-layouts -fsyntax-only -mms-bitfields -verify %s 2>&1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct A {
>>>>>> - char a : 9; // expected-error{{size of bit-field 'a' (9 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds size of its type (8 bits)}}
>>>>>> - int b : 33; // expected-error{{size of bit-field 'b' (33 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds size of its type (32 bits)}}
>>>>>> - bool c : 9; // expected-error{{size of bit-field 'c' (9 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds size of its type (8 bits)}}
>>>>>> + char a : 9; // expected-error{{width of bit-field 'a' (9 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds width of its type (8 bits)}}
>>>>>> + int b : 33; // expected-error{{width of bit-field 'b' (33 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds width of its type (32 bits)}}
>>>>>> + bool c : 9; // expected-error{{width of bit-field 'c' (9 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds width of its type (1 bit)}}
>>>>>> + bool d : 3; // expected-error{{width of bit-field 'd' (3 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds width of its type (1 bit)}}
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int a[sizeof(A) == 1 ? 1 : -1];
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/class-bitfield.m
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/class-bitfield.m?rev=247618&r1=247617&r2=247618&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/class-bitfield.m (original)
>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/class-bitfield.m Mon Sep 14 16:27:36 2015
>>>>>> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>>>>>> int a : -1; // expected-error{{bit-field 'a' has negative width}}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> // rdar://6081627
>>>>>> - int b : 33; // expected-error{{size of bit-field 'b' (33 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds size of its type (32 bits)}}
>>>>>> + int b : 33; // expected-error{{width of bit-field 'b' (33 bits)
>>>>>> exceeds width of its type (32 bits)}}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int c : (1 + 0.25); // expected-error{{expression is not an
>>>>>> integer constant expression}}
>>>>>> int d : (int)(1 + 0.25);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20150914/e2272431/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list