[PATCH] D10857: Update documentation for unroll pragmas on loops with runtime trip counts

Mark Heffernan meheff at google.com
Thu Jul 9 20:23:20 PDT 2015


meheff updated this revision to Diff 29425.
meheff added a comment.

Removing the llvm-specific flag sounds good to me.  Updated in diff.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D10857

Files:
  docs/LanguageExtensions.rst

Index: docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
===================================================================
--- docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
+++ docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
@@ -1991,10 +1991,10 @@
 reduces the trip count.
 
 If ``unroll(full)`` is specified the unroller will attempt to fully unroll the
-loop if the trip count is known at compile time. If the loop count is not known
-or the fully unrolled code size is greater than the limit specified by the
-`-pragma-unroll-threshold` command line option the loop will be partially
-unrolled subject to the same limit.
+loop if the trip count is known at compile time. If the fully unrolled code size
+is greater than an internal limit the loop will be partially unrolled up to this
+limit. If the loop count is not known at compile time the loop will not be
+unrolled.
 
 .. code-block:: c++
 
@@ -2006,7 +2006,7 @@
 The unroll count can be specified explicitly with ``unroll_count(_value_)`` where
 _value_ is a positive integer. If this value is greater than the trip count the
 loop will be fully unrolled. Otherwise the loop is partially unrolled subject
-to the `-pragma-unroll-threshold` limit.
+to the same code size limit as with ``unroll(full)``.
 
 .. code-block:: c++
 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D10857.29425.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20150710/45a19413/attachment.bin>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list