[PATCH] FileCheck-ize test and make sure more things don't happen.

[Paul Robinson]

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10747#195045, @dblaikie wrote:

> Looks good - alternatively you could phrase this as a single function with
>  a macro for the nodebug attribute - two clang+FileCheck lines, one passes
>  -D to enable the nodebug, one passes an empty -D. Might be a more direct
>  comparison? (& does require two clang invocations, which is a tradeoff)


Yeah, but for this it doesn't really seem worthwhile; the functions are pretty trivial and the checks are very generic.
For something more specific/fine-tuned, or bigger test functions, it might be more worth it.

r240747, thanks!


REPOSITORY
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D10747

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/