[PATCH] [MIPS] fix extension of integer types (function calls)

Petar Jovanovic petar.jovanovic at imgtec.com
Mon Apr 27 17:36:57 PDT 2015


In http://reviews.llvm.org/D9198#162163, @dsanders wrote:

> > IIRC from a recent discussion, unsigned 32-bit int are represented in a 64-bit register as sign-extended value of the 32-bit value (i.e. bit 31 is copied through the top half). So, the caller has to make sure the value is correctly represented before making a call, right?
>
>
> That's correct in general, all the 32-bit operations sign-extend their result to 64-bit. The ABI documentation is trying to match this architectural behaviour but that didn't seem to be what was actually implemented in gcc.


My understanding is that the called function should assume sign-extended (both signed and unsigned) 32-bit integers as inputs on its entry and compiler can base decisions on that. One [1] of Strahinja's previous patches was led by a bug when floating point value was NOT sign-extended but zero-extended before the call, and that led to an incorrect behaviour in the called function. For that particular case, GCC was sign-extending the value before making a call.

I know this area is not well defined, this is why I brought another example to take into account before any decision is made.

[1] http://reviews.llvm.org/D7791


http://reviews.llvm.org/D9198

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/






More information about the cfe-commits mailing list