[PATCH] [MSVC] Explicit specializations can be declared in any namespace (fix for http://llvm.org/PR13738)

[David Blaikie]

Test case? Also I think we're trying to avoid implementing every random
extension from msvc, preferring to update choose where the number of
instances of code relying on the extension is small (& not in a platform
header) - do you have a particular case where this shows up a lot (such
that it's a substaintial burden to update the code to be conforming)?

I might be wrong about this, so others may come in to correct me, that's
just my vague understanding


REPOSITORY
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D8283

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/