[PATCH] Preprocessor: Move IncrementalProcessing to PreprocessorOptions

[Sterling Augustine]

Circling back to this incremental parsing.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Vassil Vassilev <vvasilev at cern.ch> wrote:
> The reason we went for IncrementalProcessing is that it does more than just
> parsing, it allows clang to be able to continue working even upon seeing an
> EOF token.

Right.

> Could you also add a test case maybe closer to your planned use-case?

It's actually somewhat difficult because it requires a lot of
infrastructure to get there.

The short version is that ParseAST doesn't allow me to modify the
preprocessor before it starts parsing.

But from a functionality perspective, nothing should be different than
it is today. Whatever test cases exist should cover the functionality
present.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Axel Naumann <Axel.Naumann at cern.ch> wrote:
> Wow, that's so much nicer!

Thanks!

OK to check in?

Sterling