r226735 - DebugInfo: Remove distinct-call-inlining test case as this is being fixed in LLVM.

[David Blaikie]

Author: dblaikie
Date: Wed Jan 21 16:57:22 2015
New Revision: 226735

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=226735&view=rev
Log:
DebugInfo: Remove distinct-call-inlining test case as this is being fixed in LLVM.

This test will start failing shortly once this bug is fixed in LLVM. At
that point this behavior is no longer required in Clang and will be
removed. In the interim, remove this test just to avoid the race between
the LLVM and Clang commits.

After the LLVM commit, I'll cleanup the workaround behavior in Clang.

Removed:
    cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-same-line.cpp

Removed: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-same-line.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-same-line.cpp?rev=226734&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-same-line.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-same-line.cpp (removed)
@@ -1,64 +0,0 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -g -triple %itanium_abi_triple -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
-
-// Make sure that clang outputs distinct debug info for a function
-// that is inlined twice on the same line. Otherwise it would appear
-// as if the function was only inlined once.
-
-#define INLINE inline __attribute__((always_inline))
-
-int i;
-
-INLINE void sum(int a, int b) {
-  i = a + b;
-}
-
-void noinline(int x, int y) {
-  i = x + y;
-}
-
-#define CALLS sum(9, 10), sum(11, 12)
-
-inline void inlsum(int t, int u) {
-  i = t + u;
-}
-
-int main() {
-  sum(1, 2), sum(3, 4);
-  noinline(5, 6), noinline(7, 8);
-  CALLS;
-  inlsum(13, 14), inlsum(15, 16);
-}
-
-// CHECK-LABEL: @main
-// CHECK: = add {{.*}} !dbg [[FIRST_INLINE:![0-9]*]]
-// CHECK: = add {{.*}} !dbg [[SECOND_INLINE:![0-9]*]]
-
-// Check that we don't give column information (and thus end up with distinct
-// line entries) for two non-inlined calls on the same line.
-// CHECK: call {{.*}}noinline{{.*}}({{i32[ ]?[a-z]*}} 5, {{i32[ ]?[a-z]*}} 6), !dbg [[NOINLINE:![0-9]*]]
-// CHECK: call {{.*}}noinline{{.*}}({{i32[ ]?[a-z]*}} 7, {{i32[ ]?[a-z]*}} 8), !dbg [[NOINLINE]]
-
-// FIXME: These should be separate locations but because the two calls have the
-// same line /and/ column, they get coalesced into a single inlined call by
-// accident. We need discriminators or some other changes to LLVM to cope with
-// this. (this is, unfortunately, an LLVM test disguised as a Clang test - since
-// inlining is forced to happen here). It's possible this could be fixed in
-// Clang, but I doubt it'll be the right place for the fix.
-// CHECK: = add {{.*}} !dbg [[FIRST_MACRO_INLINE:![0-9]*]]
-// CHECK: = add {{.*}} !dbg [[FIRST_MACRO_INLINE]]
-
-// Even if the functions are marked inline but do not get inlined, they
-// shouldn't use column information, and thus should be at the same debug
-// location.
-// CHECK: call {{.*}}inlsum{{.*}}({{i32[ ]?[a-z]*}} 13, {{i32[ ]?[a-z]*}} 14), !dbg [[INL_FIRST:![0-9]*]]
-// CHECK: call {{.*}}inlsum{{.*}}({{i32[ ]?[a-z]*}} 15, {{i32[ ]?[a-z]*}} 16), !dbg [[INL_SECOND:![0-9]*]]
-
-// [[FIRST_INLINE]] =
-// [[SECOND_INLINE]] =
-
-// FIXME: These should be the same location since the functions appear on the
-// same line and were not inlined - they needlessly have column information
-// intended to disambiguate inlined calls, which is going to confuse GDB as it
-// doesn't cope well with column information.
-// [[INL_FIRST]] =
-// [[INL_SECOND]] =