[PATCH] clang-format.el: customization-support, MELPA-compatibility

Manuel Klimek klimek at google.com
Fri Jan 9 01:49:12 PST 2015


I'll update the XML format to contain the cursor position...

On Fri Jan 09 2015 at 10:38:13 AM Daniel Jasper <djasper at google.com> wrote:

> The cursor being past the end of the file should not lead to an error!?
> Does this happen if the cursor is a the very end of the file? Should we
> special-case that? Alternatively, it might be easier to uses clang-format's
> -lines parameter instead of -offset/-length.
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Note that the version deletes all content of a file in case of an error
>> (for example, when the cursor is past the end of the file), so I wouldn't
>> point melpa at it yet.
>> I'm working on an improved version.
>>
>> On Thu Jan 08 2015 at 4:32:22 PM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +cfe-commits (please do not cut that out during code review, the list is
>>> the source of truth for code reviews)
>>>
>>> Landed as r225447. Note that I'm planning to adapt it soon to not
>>> replace the whole buffer, but just apply the diffs (I'll cc' you on the
>>> patch for review, unless you object :)
>>>
>>> Cheers & thx!
>>> /Manuel
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 6:06:08 PM Johann Klähn <kljohann at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > +If called interactively uses the region or the current buffer if
>>>> there
>>>> > +is no active region.  If no style is given uses
>>>> `clang-format-style'."
>>>> >
>>>> > Doing full-buffer if nothing is selected is a usability problem if
>>>> one works
>>>> > in an existing codebase; if no region is selected, it should just use
>>>> the
>>>> > cursor position (which will get the current statement reflowed).
>>>> > The idea is that the user can do clang-format-buffer if they insist.
>>>> Excellent point.
>>>>
>>>> > +(put 'clang-format-executable 'risky-local-variable t)
>>>> >
>>>> > Any reason not to use :risky in the defcustom?
>>>> Oh, I thought I already did so. I must have accidently reverted that
>>>> change.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your feedback, find attached an updated patch.
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20150109/3941ca9c/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list