[PATCH] Include checker name in Static Analyzer PLIST output

Anna Zaks zaks.anna at gmail.com
Tue Jan 6 21:28:56 PST 2015


It seems wrong to me to associate the bug descriptions with checker names. I think BugType is more appropriate. Also, I don't think the checker name should be part of identifying the issue.

Said that, we do not have a very good design for issue tracking and we do not guarantee locking either category, bug type, the message, or the checker name. I'll talk to Jordan and Ted to see what they think about this.

Looks like our issue identification is only referring to the issue location (see utils/analyzer/CmpRuns.py).


http://reviews.llvm.org/D6841

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/






More information about the cfe-commits mailing list