Wrong lookup performed for __super

[Nikola Smiljanic]

Ping.

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Something like this?
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>
>> I see lots of calls to LookupQualifiedName and only a few of them check
>> if they should call LookupInSuper.
>>
>> Many users of LookupQualifiedName are looking up thinks like
>> SomeClass::operator=, so they don't have a CXXScopeSpec. Maybe we should
>> add a CXXScopeSpec overload to LookupQualifiedName to make it easier for
>> callers to do the right thing?
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ping
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It seems that there's one more place where we need to call
>>>> LookupInSuper. I've modified the relevant tests to catch this by having
>>>> different signature for the method and making sure the right one is called.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20141124/8c53dc2c/attachment.html>